Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prevention-Focused Screener for Perinatal Depression Risk: Mixed Methods Cohort Study

Krishnamurti T, Rodriguez S, Cope L, Lemon L, Gopalan P, Nikolajski C, Simhan H, Williams K

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prevention-Focused Screener for Perinatal Depression Risk: Mixed Methods Cohort Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e81638

DOI: 10.2196/81638

PMID: 42085674

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prevention-Focused Screener for Perinatal Depression Risk: Mixed Methods Cohort Study

  • Tamar Krishnamurti; 
  • Samantha Rodriguez; 
  • Leah Cope; 
  • Lara Lemon; 
  • Priya Gopalan; 
  • Cara Nikolajski; 
  • Hyagriv Simhan; 
  • Kelly Williams

ABSTRACT

Background:

Over 20% of perinatal individuals experience depression, with suicide being a leading cause of US maternal death. Professional societies emphasize the need to identify those at risk of developing perinatal depression to better target preventive care delivery during pregnancy.

Objective:

We evaluated patient receptivity to a machine learning-based predictive screener designed to identify asymptomatic first-trimester patients who are at risk for developing moderate-to-severe depression symptoms later in their pregnancy.

Methods:

Our population included adult pregnant patients with negative first-trimester depression/ PHQ-9 screens. Of the 810 clinically eligible patients, 787 were successfully contacted. Of these 289 (37%) viewed and 255 (88%) completed the 6-question predictive screener sent via their patient portal. Fifty-one (20%) were identified by the screener as at-risk for developing peripartum depression.

Results:

On a 5-point Likert scale of agreement, participants found screener questions easy to complete (mean (SD)=4.70 (0.66)) and felt comfortable sharing answers with providers (4.54 (0.77)). Key perceived benefits of completing the screener included seeking preventive care opportunities (75/255, 29.4%) and receiving education on depression risk (66/255, 25.9%). Primary concerns of knowing one’s risk of future depression included worrying about developing depression (90/255, 35.3%) and a lack of prevention opportunities (39/255, 15.3%). Desired preventive resources included counseling (197/255, 77.3%), mind/body interventions (166/255, 65.1%), such as exercise, and prenatal classes/support groups (81/255, 31.8%).

Conclusions:

Most patients accessing the screener completed it and offered feedback. Participants found the screener acceptable and felt comfortable receiving it through their patient portal. Patients endorsed specific preventive care options, several of which were scalable and evidence-based, while a minority voiced addressable concerns about knowing their risk of developing depression in the future.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Krishnamurti T, Rodriguez S, Cope L, Lemon L, Gopalan P, Nikolajski C, Simhan H, Williams K

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prevention-Focused Screener for Perinatal Depression Risk: Mixed Methods Cohort Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e81638

DOI: 10.2196/81638

PMID: 42085674

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.