Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Jul 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 8, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Electrostimulation Using a Wearable Electro Suit and Qualitative Feedback From a Mixed Cohort of Survivors of Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury With Spasticity: Case Series

Yen JM, Kamsani NS, Lai HS, Tang N, Chew E

Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Electrostimulation Using a Wearable Electro Suit and Qualitative Feedback From a Mixed Cohort of Survivors of Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury With Spasticity: Case Series

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e81522

DOI: 10.2196/81522

PMID: 42361230

PMCID: 13308753

Individualized electrostimulation using a wearable electro suit in a mixed cohort of stroke and spinal cord injury with spasticity: Clinical outcomes and qualitative feedback

  • Jia Min Yen; 
  • Nur Shafawati Kamsani; 
  • Hwa Sen Lai; 
  • Ning Tang; 
  • Effie Chew

ABSTRACT

Background:

Various forms of electrical stimulation have been integrated into the multimodal management of spasticity; however, high-frequency electrical stimulation can potentially induce muscle fatigue. As an alternative approach, the Exopulse MolliiĀ® suit (EMS) is a multi-channel full-body garment that delivers low frequency (20Hz) low amplitude (20V) sub-threshold sensory stimulation aimed at reducing spasticity.

Objective:

Primarily, we examined the effects of a single session of EMS on spasticity in seven participants with chronic stroke or spinal cord injury (SCI) and assessed the impact on gait and ambulatory function. User perceptions of usability and acceptability were also evaluated.

Methods:

Participants wore EMS for 60 minutes, combined with standardised light activities in blocks of 15 minutes alternating with 15-minute rest breaks.

Results:

Based on Modified Tardieu Scale and surface electromyography signals, improvements in spasticity were only observed in two participants. However, four participants demonstrated faster walking speeds. Improvements in Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSTS) and step test were noted in three and four participants respectively. Improved gait patterns were observed after use of EMS, particularly in SCI participants. Spatiotemporal gait parameters revealed improvements in gait symmetry in six participants. Qualitative feedback based on NATU quest returned positive results in three participants. Overall outcomes, defined as meeting the individualised goals of each participant, were positive in four.

Conclusions:

EMS is effective in improving dynamic balance, motor control and gait quality. Additionally, self- administration of EMS at home is feasible for patients with spasticity. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of the effects of EMS in participants with SCI and the first to report spatiotemporal gait parameters with use of EMS.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yen JM, Kamsani NS, Lai HS, Tang N, Chew E

Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Electrostimulation Using a Wearable Electro Suit and Qualitative Feedback From a Mixed Cohort of Survivors of Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury With Spasticity: Case Series

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e81522

DOI: 10.2196/81522

PMID: 42361230

PMCID: 13308753

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.