Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of the Online Portal “Embryotox” in Routine Health Care: Mixed Methods Study

Onken M, Beck E, Breuning M, Holmberg C, Metke F, Müller A, Schaefer C, Dathe K

Use of the Online Portal “Embryotox” in Routine Health Care: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e81286

DOI: 10.2196/81286

PMID: 42348905

Use of the Online Portal Embryotox.de in Routine Healthcare: a Mixed-Methods Study

  • Marlies Onken; 
  • Evelin Beck; 
  • Martina Breuning; 
  • Christine Holmberg; 
  • Franziska Metke; 
  • Anne Müller; 
  • Christof Schaefer; 
  • Katarina Dathe

ABSTRACT

Background:

Since 2008, the open-access internet portal embryotox.de provides evidence-based information on drug safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The German website, designed for healthcare professionals, comprises factsheets about 400 drugs and is maintained by the Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy at the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. In 2024, it was accessed more than five million times.

Objective:

This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate who is using the website, how it is being used, and to what extent it meets users’ needs.

Methods:

Data were collected between 2022 and 2023. Online questionnaire 1 contained questions on user characteristics, clinical specifics of use, comprehensibility and changes of risk assessment or drug therapy following factsheet use. Answers included multiple choice options or ratings on a Likert Scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (fully). Online questionnaire 2 collected data on decision-making based on Embryotox factsheets. Answers included multiple choice options or ratings on a Likert Scale. Data from both questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were generated through semi-structured phone interviews, with interviewees sampled from the main user groups identified in questionnaire 1, i.e. patients, physicians, pharmacists and midwives. Kuckartz’s content analysis was employed to analyze data on users' trust and the functions of website use for different stakeholder groups.

Results:

Questionnaire 1 was completed by 14,562 users, including 10,860 patients, 1,676 physicians, 550 pharmacists and 364 midwives. Of the physicians, 27.2% (n=456/1,676) were obstetricians/gynecologists and 22.7% (n=381/1,676) general practitioners. For physicians, mean of comprehensibility ratings was 9.39 (pharmacists 9.25, midwives 9.14), for patients 8.80. Following factsheet use, 66.6% (n=9,694/14,562) of all users changed their perception of risk, and 22.3% of users in a specific treatment setting (n=2,252/10,083) considered changing drug treatment. Qualitative content analysis revealed that users highly trusted the information in the factsheets for a number of reasons, including recommendations from other users, the scientific basis of the website, and the authority of the Embryotox Center as a university-based specialist department for drug safety in pregnancy and lactation. Functions of factsheet use differed depending on the stakeholder group. A total of n=793 users, mostly physicians and patients, fully completed questionnaire 2, specifying typical clinical situations and benefits of factsheet use in the context of shared decision-making. Benefits included facilitating the decision-making process and increasing confidence in it.

Conclusions:

The information provided in the Embryotox factsheets was generally perceived as both comprehensible and trustworthy, supporting and facilitating the decision-making process. Clinical Trial: -


 Citation

Please cite as:

Onken M, Beck E, Breuning M, Holmberg C, Metke F, Müller A, Schaefer C, Dathe K

Use of the Online Portal “Embryotox” in Routine Health Care: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e81286

DOI: 10.2196/81286

PMID: 42348905

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.