Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 17, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Enhancing Self-Efficacy Through Robotic Safety Support in Balance-Challenging Reach Tasks: A Feasibility Study in Young Adults
ABSTRACT
Background:
Falls and fear of falling adversely affect the quality of life and independence of older adults. Although various robotic systems have been developed for fall prevention, their psychological effects, particularly on self-efficacy, remain underexplored. A ceiling-mounted fall-impact-mitigation robot offers continuous protection with almost no limitations on the range of movement; however, its impact on users' psychological state and functional performance is unclear.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of a fall-impact-mitigation robot on psychological reassurance and task performance during dynamic balance tasks in healthy young adults, with a focus on self-efficacy and functional reach capacity.
Methods:
Twenty-four healthy adults (mean age: 28.9 ± 7.9 years) were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 12) or control (n = 12) groups. All participants performed a baseline Functional Reach Test (FRT), followed by a series of progressively challenging reach tasks (starting at 98% of maximum reach and increasing by 2% until failure). The experimental group performed tasks while wearing the fall-impact-mitigation robot; the control group performed without it. Self-efficacy ratings (–5 to +5 scale) were recorded before each trial. Center of pressure (COP) data were continuously collected. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests for self-efficacy, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for task performance, and t-tests for FRT and COP changes.
Results:
During reach trials ≥ 102% of baseline, the experimental group reported significantly higher self-efficacy ratings than those of the control group (median: 1.0 vs 0.0; U = 1292.5, P = .047). However, no significant differences were observed in changes in functional reach capacity (104.2 ± 3.8% vs 103.6 ± 2.5%; P = .615) or COP displacement (108.9 ± 10.4% vs 114.1 ± 9.8%; P = .227). Survival analysis revealed a non-significant trend toward greater task persistence in the experimental group (χ² = 0.36, P = .55).
Conclusions:
The fall-impact-mitigation robot significantly improved self-efficacy during challenging balance tasks, despite providing no active physical support. These findings underscore the role of psychological reassurance in modulating balance-related behavior and suggest that robotic safety systems may influence motor performance through psychological mechanisms. Integrating psychological support into robotic fall prevention strategies may enhance their effectiveness.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.