Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automated Prediction of Glasgow Coma Scale Scores From Unstructured Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation Study

Fernandes M, Turley N, Sun H, Mukerji SS, Moura LMVR, Westover MB, Zafar SF

Automated Prediction of Glasgow Coma Scale Scores From Unstructured Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e81245

DOI: 10.2196/81245

PMID: 42372230

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Automated Glasgow Coma Scale Score Extraction: Mining Unstructured Electronic Health Records

  • Marta Fernandes; 
  • Niels Turley; 
  • Haoqi Sun; 
  • Shibani S. Mukerji; 
  • Lidia M. V. R. Moura; 
  • M. Brandon Westover; 
  • Sahar F. Zafar

ABSTRACT

Background:

Multicenter electronic health records (EHR) can support quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research in critical care. However, limitations of EHR-based research include challenges in abstracting key clinical variables, including a patient’s level of consciousness.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to develop a natural language processing (NLP) model to predict the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores from daily EHR notes.

Methods:

The study included adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to Massachusetts General Brigham (MGB) hospitals (2017-2024) and patients from the MIMIC-III database (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-MIMIC III 2001-2012) v1.4. A dataset with daily notes, age, sex, admission type, of all patients from both institutions was split into train/hold-out test (70%/30%) sets. We trained an ordinal regression model “ordinalNet” with an elastic net penalty to predict the lowest daily score among three levels: severe (GCS 3-8), moderate (GCS 9-12) and mild (GCS 13-15). Model performance was assessed in the hold-out test set (MGB+MIMIC) using areas under the receiver characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC).

Results:

Our modeling cohort included 55,285 patients (MGB =36,696; MIMIC =18,589) with 122,010 days of hospitalization; average age 64 [SD 17] years; 56% male, and 76% White. The ordinalNet achieved AUROC and AUPRC [95% CI]: MGB + MIMIC – 0.91 [0.91-0.91] and 0.84 [0.83-0.84]; MGB – 0.91 [0.90-0.91] and 0.83 [0.82-0.84]; MIMIC –0.91 [0.90-0.91] and 0.83 [0.83-0.84]. The model predicted severe GCS 3-8 with AUROC and AUPRC of 0.97 [0.97-0.97] and 0.94 [0.93-0.94].

Conclusions:

Our NLP-based model can enable large-scale phenotyping of neurological assessments and critical care research studies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fernandes M, Turley N, Sun H, Mukerji SS, Moura LMVR, Westover MB, Zafar SF

Automated Prediction of Glasgow Coma Scale Scores From Unstructured Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e81245

DOI: 10.2196/81245

PMID: 42372230

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.