Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 21, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Context-Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (Small Steps for Big Changes) in Australia: Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

Healy GN, Gomersall SR, Dunstan DW, Winkler EA, Heseltine K, Sim GQ, Mason F, Giguere D, Tsiamis M, Jung ME, Goode AD

A Context-Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (Small Steps for Big Changes) in Australia: Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e81195

DOI: 10.2196/81195

PMID: 41554121

PMCID: 12865356

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Protocol for the implementation and evaluation of a context-adapted diabetes prevention program: Small Steps for Big Changes (SSBC) – Australia

  • Genevieve Nissa Healy; 
  • Sjaan Rhonda Gomersall; 
  • David Wayne Dunstan; 
  • Elisabeth A.H. Winkler; 
  • Katherine Heseltine; 
  • Grace Q. Sim; 
  • Fiona Mason; 
  • Denis Giguere; 
  • Michael Tsiamis; 
  • Mary E. Jung; 
  • Ana D. Goode

ABSTRACT

Background:

With type 2 diabetes rates escalating worldwide, effective, acceptable and sustainable diabetes prevention programs are needed. Small Steps for Big Changes (SSBC) is a Canadian-developed and community-delivered diet and exercise counselling intervention for individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. The 3-6 week intervention is deliverable by non-health professionals, with all SSBC coaches receiving training in delivery of the program, including motivational interviewing. Funding has been obtained to adapt, implement and evaluate the SSBC program in Australia.

Objective:

This protocol describes the process of adapting the SSBC program to an Australian delivery context (SSBC Australia), including the novel use of pre-professional graduate and undergraduate students from a range of programs as coaches. It also details the protocol for the type 2 cluster non-randomised single-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of the program in Australian community sites.

Methods:

A multiphase process will be used to adapt and deliver SSBC in Australia, including an exploratory phase to understand site needs and adaptations required (completed) followed by a delivery phase. The integrated PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation Sustainability Model) and RE-AIM (Reach, Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, and the APEASE (Affordability, Practicality, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, and Equity) criteria will guide the implementation and evaluation of these phases and inform iterative adaptations as required. SSBC Australia will be delivered and evaluated in five community-based sites across two organisations in South-East Queensland, Australia. One organisation (one site) will trial training students on clinical and project placements to act as coaches. The recruitment target is 500 participants completing the six-session intervention across the five sites within two years, and approximately 50 coaches trained. Data will be collected from the organisation, provider site, coach, and client using a variety of methods (surveys, objective assessments, qualitative interviews, site audits, website analytics, meeting minutes, project tracking). Data will be collected on the: context for delivery; adoption and reach (number of coaches and clients and their characteristics); effectiveness of the coach training and the intervention (client pre-post changes in measured clinical indicators [body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance], and self-reported health behaviours [movement behaviours; healthy eating; program behaviours], psychosocial indicators [self-efficacy; social supports], quality of life, diabetes status, health care utilisation); implementation of the coach training and program delivery (fidelity; acceptability); and, maintenance of program delivery (sites) and client outcomes at 3-, 6- and 12-months post end-of-program.

Results:

Trial ethics has been obtained, and the five sites are recruited. Resources have been iteratively adapted and pilot tested for the Australian delivery context, including for student delivery. The trial will start in mid-2025.

Conclusions:

This study will provide evidence whether the culturally-adapted SSBC diabetes prevention program can be successfully implemented and is effective within an Australian context. Clinical Trial: This trial has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Network ACTRN12624001194550 (registered prospectively on 30th September, 2024; last update 27th April 2025).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Healy GN, Gomersall SR, Dunstan DW, Winkler EA, Heseltine K, Sim GQ, Mason F, Giguere D, Tsiamis M, Jung ME, Goode AD

A Context-Adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (Small Steps for Big Changes) in Australia: Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e81195

DOI: 10.2196/81195

PMID: 41554121

PMCID: 12865356

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.