Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of Body Weight Support–Assisted Balance and Gait Training With or Without Balance Perturbations in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

Grevelding P, Meyer A, Corbett J, Rudolf K, Meise E, Boland C, Grzelak C, Hrdlicka HC

Comparison of Body Weight Support–Assisted Balance and Gait Training With or Without Balance Perturbations in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e80525

DOI: 10.2196/80525

PMID: 41359867

PMCID: 12685234

Comparison of body-weight support-assisted balance and gait training with or without balance perturbations in post-stroke rehabilitation: A multisite randomized controlled trial

  • Pete Grevelding; 
  • Amanda Meyer; 
  • John Corbett; 
  • Kaitlyn Rudolf; 
  • Emily Meise; 
  • Caitlin Boland; 
  • Camille Grzelak; 
  • Henry Charles Hrdlicka

ABSTRACT

Background:

Impaired balance regulation after stroke puts patients and therapists at a heightened risk of injury during rehabilitation. Body weight support systems (BWSS) allow patients to safely conduct gait and balance training while minimizing risk and the fear of falling. Integrating perturbation-based balance training (PBT) modules with a BWSS may lead to further improvements.

Objective:

Our goal was to evaluate the impact of a ceiling-track mounted BWSS integrated with a novel PBT (BWSS-P) module on the rehabilitation of stroke-related gait and balance impairments.

Methods:

A multisite randomized active-comparator controlled trial was conducted. Inpatients with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores ≥21/56 were recruited from 4 sites. Participants completed two-to-six BWSS or BWSS-P study sessions. Both groups conducted the same balance and gait regimen, with the BWSS-P group also receiving eight balance perturbations per session. BBS, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC), and 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) assessments were collected.

Results:

126 patients were approached with 99 yielding sufficient data for analysis. With a corrected alpha level of α=.0054, both groups showed significant in-group changes over time for all outcomes evaluated (P≤.001). However, the primary outcome measure, the BBS, did not show evidence of a difference between BWSS and BWSS-P groups over time (F1,97=1.57, P=0.21) via linear mixed-effects modeling with type III Wald F test with Kenward-Roger degrees of freedom. No significant between-group differences were noted for either secondary outcome measure, the ABC scale (F1,94.99=0.36, P=.55), or 10MWT (F1,97=4.15, P=.04).

Conclusions:

Although significant between-group differences were not observed, participants in both groups demonstrated similar improvements from pre- to post-assessment. This novel PBT technology shows promise as an option for gait and balance recovery training, especially for individuals with impaired balance control or fear of falling. The BWSS-P intervention contributed positively to rehabilitation outcome overall and should be considered as a viable treatment modality when clinically appropriate. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05110300); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05110300.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Grevelding P, Meyer A, Corbett J, Rudolf K, Meise E, Boland C, Grzelak C, Hrdlicka HC

Comparison of Body Weight Support–Assisted Balance and Gait Training With or Without Balance Perturbations in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e80525

DOI: 10.2196/80525

PMID: 41359867

PMCID: 12685234

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.