Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 11, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adherence to Accelerometer Use in Older Adults Undergoing mHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Barua S, Upadhyay D, Pena S, McConnell R, Varghese A, Adhikari S, LeRoy E, Schoenthaler A, Dodson JA

Adherence to Accelerometer Use in Older Adults Undergoing mHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e80522

DOI: 10.2196/80522

PMID: 41435373

PMCID: 12777647

Adherence to Accelerometer Use Correlates with Improved Functional Capacity in Older Adults Undergoing mHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • Souptik Barua; 
  • Dhairya Upadhyay; 
  • Stephanie Pena; 
  • Riley McConnell; 
  • Ashwini Varghese; 
  • Samrachana Adhikari; 
  • Erik LeRoy; 
  • Antoinette Schoenthaler; 
  • John A. Dodson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable accelerometers are commonly used in mHealth-enabled cardiac rehabilitation (mHealth-CR), but the role of adherence to accelerometer use on clinical outcomes is understudied.

Objective:

In this context, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) framework to quantify adherence to accelerometer use and its association with functional capacity improvements in older adults undergoing mHealth-CR.

Methods:

We analyzed data from the RESILIENT trial, the largest randomized clinical trial to date comparing mHealth-CR versus usual care in older adults (age ≥65 years). Intervention arm participants were instructed to wear a Fitbit accelerometer for the 3-month study duration. Adherence to accelerometer use was quantified as overall adherence (percentage of days worn) and via k-means clustering AI-derived measures and compared with changes in 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD), adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates.

Results:

Among 271 participants (mean age 71±8 years, 73% male), accelerometers were worn an average 76 days [95% CI: 73,78 days] over 3 months. Adjusted analyses showed a weak association between days of wear and improvement in 6-MWD, with every 30 additional days associated with an 11-meter improvement (p=0.08). Our AI framework identified 8 distinct phenotypes of accelerometry adherence over the 3-month intervention. In adjusted analysis, the three highest AI-derived accelerometry adherence phenotypes trended towards a 20-meter [95% CI: -2,41 meters; p=0.07] higher improvement in 6-MWD than the other five phenotypes.

Conclusions:

Adherence to accelerometer use showed a weak association with functional capacity improvement in older adults undergoing mHealth-CR. Our AI-derived accelerometry adherence phenotypes can enable personalized mHealth-CR regimens for optimal patient benefit.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Barua S, Upadhyay D, Pena S, McConnell R, Varghese A, Adhikari S, LeRoy E, Schoenthaler A, Dodson JA

Adherence to Accelerometer Use in Older Adults Undergoing mHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e80522

DOI: 10.2196/80522

PMID: 41435373

PMCID: 12777647

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.