Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 19, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Surrogate Decision-Making by Family Caregivers for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Qualitative Study in a High-Volume Chinese Center

Tan ZKK, Li DN, Jia K, Tang WZ, Chen X, Yang L

Surrogate Decision-Making by Family Caregivers for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Qualitative Study in a High-Volume Chinese Center

JMIR Cancer 2026;12:e80471

DOI: 10.2196/80471

PMID: 41553107

PMCID: 12865350

Surrogate Decision-Making by Family Caregivers for HIPEC in Gastric Cancer: A Qualitative Study in a High-Volume Chinese Center

  • Zheng-Ke-Ke Tan; 
  • Dan-Ni Li; 
  • Kui Jia; 
  • Wen-Zhen Tang; 
  • Xin Chen; 
  • Li Yang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is employed as a preventive and therapeutic measure for abdominal metastasis following gastric cancer (GC) surgery. The determination of whether to administer HIPEC to GC patients typically occurs during the surgical procedure. As a result, family members frequently assume the role of surrogate decision-makers. The intricate nature of this process can exert an impact on the treatment decisions made on behalf of the patients.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore the real experience and influencing factors of family caregivers for surrogate decision-making regarding intraperitoneal HIPEC in patients with GC.

Methods:

The study adopted a qualitative approach using semistructured interviews, 15 family caregivers of patients with GC in a top-three hospital in Guangxi Province were selected as research objects through purposive sampling method. Participants were asked to comment on their experience of surrogate decision-making for HIPEC process, including motivations, difficulties, and decision-making methods. Colaizzi seven-step method was used to analyze and summarize the themes.

Results:

We extracted four themes as follows: (1) decision-information sources (decision-making information came from medical-care personnel, decision-making information came from the Internet, and decision-making information came from acquaintances); (2) barriers to decision making (financial burden and effects and side effects of treatment); (3) motivation in decision making (positive health beliefs and surrogate decision makers perceived responsibility); and (4) decision-making participation mode (doctor-led passive decision making and doctor–family sharing decision making).

Conclusions:

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy decision making by family caregivers of patients with GC is primarily passive decision making, and many obstacles and motivations are encountered in the process. Medical staff should share information and encourage and guide family caregivers to participate in the decision-making process through decision assistance or decision support. Clinical Trial: This study was a survey study, approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (2024-E055-01).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tan ZKK, Li DN, Jia K, Tang WZ, Chen X, Yang L

Surrogate Decision-Making by Family Caregivers for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Qualitative Study in a High-Volume Chinese Center

JMIR Cancer 2026;12:e80471

DOI: 10.2196/80471

PMID: 41553107

PMCID: 12865350

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.