Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Jul 14, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 25, 2025 - Aug 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Cultural Feasibility of Conversational Robots for Dementia Care in India: Participatory Design Study

Lima MR, Srinivasan N, Daniels S, Vaitheswaran S, Vaidyanathan R

Cultural Feasibility of Conversational Robots for Dementia Care in India: Participatory Design Study

J Particip Med 2025;17:e80457

DOI: 10.2196/80457

PMID: 41197121

PMCID: 12635592

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Cultural Feasibility of Conversational Robots for Dementia Care in India

  • Maria R. Lima; 
  • Nivedhitha Srinivasan; 
  • Sarah Daniels; 
  • Sridhar Vaitheswaran; 
  • Ravi Vaidyanathan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Dementia poses a significant challenge in India. Rising incidence rates, limited resources, and restricted clinician access contribute to a staggering 90% gap in diagnosis and care. Conversational technology provides a natural user interface with potential to promote the independence, well-being, and safety of people living with dementia (PLWD) at home. However, the feasibility of implementing such technology to support PLWD across diverse cultural and economic settings remains underexplored.

Objective:

We introduce a cultural feasibility study of conversational robots for dementia care in India, an underserved cultural context in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) for aging and dementia care.

Methods:

We involved 29 stakeholders, including PLWD, caregivers, and dementia care professionals. We evaluated: 1) engagement of PLWD with three conversational robots with varying interactive modalities (a voice agent, a virtual affective robot, and an embodied robot), 2) robot acceptance, and 3) stakeholder perspectives on the benefits and challenges of deploying conversational AI in India.

Results:

PLWD accepted and were willing to engage with conversational robots in verbal dialogue. Stakeholders perceived the technology as beneficial for supporting daily tasks at home, reducing loneliness, and enhancing cognitive function. We identified design adaptations to address feasibility challenges in India, including the need to: adapt interaction style to use kind tone, appreciative language, and customizable facial expressions; improve speech recognition for local accent interpretation and noisy settings; and introduce prototypes in local clinics to promote familiarity.

Conclusions:

This work offers novel insights into cultural acceptance, human-robot engagement, perceived utility for dementia care, and key design implications to integrating conversational AI into care settings in India.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lima MR, Srinivasan N, Daniels S, Vaitheswaran S, Vaidyanathan R

Cultural Feasibility of Conversational Robots for Dementia Care in India: Participatory Design Study

J Particip Med 2025;17:e80457

DOI: 10.2196/80457

PMID: 41197121

PMCID: 12635592

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.