Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 5, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating an AI Decision Support System for the Emergency Department: Retrospective Study

Van Der Haas Y, Roskamp W, Chang L, van Dongen B, Jansen S, de Jong A, Medeiros de Carvalho R, Melman D, van de Merwe A, Sanders M, Overbeek B, Plas R, Vreeburg M, van Dijk T

Evaluating an AI Decision Support System for the Emergency Department: Retrospective Study

JMIR AI 2026;5:e80448

DOI: 10.2196/80448

PMID: 41587768

PMCID: 12887564

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating an AI decision support system for the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study

  • Yvette Van Der Haas; 
  • Wiesje Roskamp; 
  • Lidwine Chang; 
  • Boudewijn van Dongen; 
  • Swetta Jansen; 
  • Annemarie de Jong; 
  • Renata Medeiros de Carvalho; 
  • Dorien Melman; 
  • Arjan van de Merwe; 
  • Marieke Sanders; 
  • Bart Overbeek; 
  • Rogier Plas; 
  • Marleen Vreeburg; 
  • Thomas van Dijk

ABSTRACT

Background:

Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a growing challenge, associated with increased medical errors, longer patient stays, higher morbidity, and mortality rates. AI decision support tools have shown potential to address this problem by assisting with faster decision making regarding patient admissions, yet many studies neglect to focus on the clinical relevance and practical applications of these AI solutions.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of an AI model in predicting patient admission from the ED to hospital wards and its potential impact on reducing the time needed to make an admission decision.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted using anonymised patient data from St. Antonius Hospital, The Netherlands, covering January 2018 to September 2023. An XGBoost AI model was developed and tested on this data to predict admission decisions. The model was evaluated using data segmented into 10-minute intervals, which reflects the real-world applicability. The primary outcome measured was the reduction in time per admission decision compared to healthcare professionals. Secondary outcomes analysed the performance of the model of various subgroups, including the age of the patient, the medical specialty, the classification category, and the time of day.

Results:

The AI model demonstrated a precision of 0.78 and a recall of 0.73, with a median saved 111 minutes for true positive predicted patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that elderly patients and certain specialities, such as pulmonology, benefited the most from the AI model, with time savings of up to 90 minutes per patient.

Conclusions:

The AI model shows significant potential to reduce the time to admission decisions, alleviate ED overcrowding, and improve patient care. The model offers the advantage of always providing weighted advice on admission, even when the ED is under pressure. Future prospective studies are needed to assess the impact in the real world and further enhance the performance of the model in diverse hospital settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Van Der Haas Y, Roskamp W, Chang L, van Dongen B, Jansen S, de Jong A, Medeiros de Carvalho R, Melman D, van de Merwe A, Sanders M, Overbeek B, Plas R, Vreeburg M, van Dijk T

Evaluating an AI Decision Support System for the Emergency Department: Retrospective Study

JMIR AI 2026;5:e80448

DOI: 10.2196/80448

PMID: 41587768

PMCID: 12887564

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.