Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Jul 6, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 15, 2025 - Sep 9, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 16, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study

Veldmeijer L, Terlouw G, Van 'T Veer J, Van Os J, Boonstra N

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study

J Particip Med 2025;17:e80184

DOI: 10.2196/80184

PMID: 41343826

PMCID: 12715466

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Developed by People with Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: A Design Research Approach

  • Lars Veldmeijer; 
  • Gijs Terlouw; 
  • Job Van 'T Veer; 
  • Jim Van Os; 
  • Nynke Boonstra

ABSTRACT

Background:

Experiences of mental distress are considered difficult to communicate, particularly experiences of psychosis. Research indicates that the frequently employed medical focus falls short in capturing the nuanced interpersonal dynamics that these altered states may involve. Psychosis may seem very different from a lived experience perspective than it does from a traditional psychiatric perspective. This calls for innovative lived-experience-based methodologies. This paper presents the development and preliminary evaluation of a design prototype designed to strengthen the role of people experiencing psychosis in the care process.

Objective:

The aim of this research is twofold. First, this study aims to co-design an approach supported by generative design methodology that enables clients to share their experiences in their own way and evaluate the developed approach with dyads of clients who experienced a first episode of psychosis and professionals. Second, it aims to provide a clear and transparent design rationale for the approach, enabling future designers and researchers to understand its intention.

Methods:

The study involved co-design workshops, a small-scale test phase with seven client-professional dyads, the generation of qualitative data through semi-structured interviews, and deductive and inductive thematic analyses.

Results:

The In Picture Approach was co-designed and tested. Findings indicate that the developed prototype stimulated motivation, dialogue, and reflection of clients, with professionals reporting improved insight into their clients and some care plans being reconsidered. While the exercises themselves were not always the source of new insights, the conversations they provoked proved meaningful. Clients felt seen and empowered, often taking initiative beyond what was expected.

Conclusions:

The paper positions the prototype as a potential boundary object that supports the alignment of experiential and professional knowledge. Guided by the Layers in Serious Media Design and Design Research Frameworks, the design process and design rationale are described, allowing future researchers and designers to learn from key design choices made in this project. Further development and long-term integration are recommended.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Veldmeijer L, Terlouw G, Van 'T Veer J, Van Os J, Boonstra N

The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study

J Particip Med 2025;17:e80184

DOI: 10.2196/80184

PMID: 41343826

PMCID: 12715466

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.