Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 3, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Causal and Noncausal Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity in Adults: Randomized Pilot Study

Korshakova E, Kleinberg S

Evaluating Causal and Noncausal Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity in Adults: Randomized Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e80090

DOI: 10.2196/80090

PMID: 41284987

PMCID: 12686858

Evaluating Causal and Non-Causal Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity in Adults: A Randomized Pilot Study

  • Elena Korshakova; 
  • Samantha Kleinberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

Physical inactivity increases risk of chronic disease and reduces life expectancy, yet adherence to physical activity (PA) guidelines remains low. SMS text messages are promising for promoting PA, but it is not clear what type of messaging is most effective. Messages with causal information, which explain why a recommendation is being made, may be more persuasive than messages containing only recommendations.

Objective:

To compare the effectiveness of causal versus non-causal SMS text messages for promoting PA in US adults.

Methods:

In this pilot we randomized 30 US adults aged 18–64 to receive causal or non-causal text messages roughly every other day for two weeks, following a one-week baseline. PA was measured using Empatica wristbands during intervention and baseline periods, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) at baseline, post-intervention, and four weeks later. The primary outcome was change in mean metabolic equivalent of task (METs) per minute from baseline to intervention. The secondary outcomes were 1) PA differences on intervention and non-intervention days (mean METs/min), 2) changes in self-reported METs per week between surveyed periods, and 3) participant satisfaction. We used a linear mixed model (LMM) to analyze our primary outcome, the Mann–Whitney U test and the Chi-square test of independence to analyze quantitative secondary outcomes, and qualitative coding to analyze survey data.

Results:

The causal message group had a greater increase in mean METs per minute from baseline to intervention compared to the non-causal group with a moderate effect size (p = .01, Cohen’s d = 0.54). In the causal group, PA was significantly higher on text message days (mean METs/min = 2.46, SD = 0.12) compared to non-message days (mean METs/min = 2.25, SD = 0.15, p = .02), while there was no difference in the non-causal group (p = .54). No significant between-group difference was found in self-reported PA or satisfaction.

Conclusions:

Causal information that links suggested PA to health outcomes can increase the effectiveness of text messages promoting PA, indicating the value of incorporating causal information into intervention design. Our results provide further basis for just-in-time interventions, as activity was higher on message days. Further work is needed to better personalize message content and timing to maintain participant engagement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Korshakova E, Kleinberg S

Evaluating Causal and Noncausal Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity in Adults: Randomized Pilot Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e80090

DOI: 10.2196/80090

PMID: 41284987

PMCID: 12686858

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.