Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 14, 2025 - Sep 8, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 14, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Parental Perspectives on the Use of Smartwatch Activity Trackers by Young Children: Qualitative Study

Davey R, Campbell A, Beynon A, Rasmussen CL, Hendry D, Stearne S, Harris C, Straker L, Zabatiero J

Parental Perspectives on the Use of Smartwatch Activity Trackers by Young Children: Qualitative Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e79851

DOI: 10.2196/79851

PMID: 41217801

PMCID: 12648127

Parental Perspectives on the Use of Smartwatch Activity Trackers by Young Children: Qualitative Study

  • Raymond Davey; 
  • Amity Campbell; 
  • Amber Beynon; 
  • Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; 
  • Danica Hendry; 
  • Sarah Stearne; 
  • Courtenay Harris; 
  • Leon Straker; 
  • Juliana Zabatiero

ABSTRACT

Background:

Smartwatch activity trackers are devices that measure physical activity levels with features that aim to encourage physically active behaviours. These devices have shown promise for increasing physical activity levels and reducing sedentary behaviours among school-aged children, adolescents, and adults. Recently, commercially available products have been adapted so that they are suitable for use by preschool-aged children. However, it is unclear whether the intended use of these devices is feasible and effective in young children.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to explore parents’ perspectives on the use of smartwatch activity trackers by young children.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 parents (77% female) of children aged 3-5 years. Interviews explored perspectives on the feasibility of their children wearing the devices, implications of use by young children, and how families could make use of these devices to support their children’s physically active behaviours. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data analysed using thematic analysis.

Results:

Parents perceived that the use of these devices by young children is feasible, with developmental stage/abilities and personality/temperament being important individual determinants of feasibility. However, parents expressed concerns related to the devices providing extrinsic motivation to move, being disruptive or distracting, being a burden on parents, and for the safety and privacy of their child’s information. Most parents believed that young children are inherently active and do not need devices to support physical activity. Furthermore, most parents expressed an interest in knowing how physically active their children were and thought that there may be a role for these devices for children who are less physically active.

Conclusions:

Parents reported developmental stage/abilities and temperament as relevant considerations related to the feasibility of smartwatch activity tracker use by young children. Parents also indicated there is a potential role for these devices in young, less active children.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Davey R, Campbell A, Beynon A, Rasmussen CL, Hendry D, Stearne S, Harris C, Straker L, Zabatiero J

Parental Perspectives on the Use of Smartwatch Activity Trackers by Young Children: Qualitative Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e79851

DOI: 10.2196/79851

PMID: 41217801

PMCID: 12648127

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.