Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Jun 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 26, 2025 - Aug 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 20, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validation of the Perception of eHealth Technology Scale in Chinese Brief (PETS-C Brief) in Nurses: Survey Study

Jilili A, Weng X, Maimaiti P, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Zhao SZ, Wang L, Guo N

Validation of the Perception of eHealth Technology Scale in Chinese Brief (PETS-C Brief) in Nurses: Survey Study

JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e79594

DOI: 10.2196/79594

PMID: 41191959

PMCID: 12588618

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Validation of the Perception of eHealth Technology Scale in Chinese Brief (PETS-C Brief) in nurses: factor analysis, validity, and reliability

  • AYiSha Jilili; 
  • Xue Weng; 
  • Palida Maimaiti; 
  • Liwen Liao; 
  • Liwen Liao; 
  • Liwen Liao; 
  • Liwen Liao; 
  • Liwen Liao; 
  • Sheng Zhi Zhao; 
  • Lin Wang; 
  • Ningyuan Guo

ABSTRACT

Background:

eHealth technologies have shown promise in improving the accessibility and quality of nursing research and practice. Less is known about nurses' perceptions of eHealth technology that are prerequisites for the implementation of eHealth-based care and studies.

Objective:

To validate the Perception of eHealth Technology Scale in Chinese Brief (PETS-C Brief) in Chinese nurses.

Methods:

Participants were 1409 nurses (96.8% female; mean age [SD] 34.6 [8.6] years). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) verified the previously reported four-factor structure of PETS-C Brief. Convergent validity was examined by analyzing correlations with scores of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) and Information Literacy Scale (ILS). Known-group validity and test-retest reliability were also assessed. Cronbach's α was calculated for internal consistency reliability. Sociodemographic and working-related characteristics were analyzed.

Results:

The goodness-of-fit of the four-factor PETS-C Brief was acceptable (CFI =0.933, SRMR=0.064, RMSEA=0.085). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α=0.912). The scale showed stable test-retest reliability over 1 month (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.684, 95% CI: 0.548, 0.778). Good convergent validity was demonstrated by positive correlations with scores on the GSE (r=0.25, P<0.001) and ILS (r=0.56, P<0.001). Known-group validity was supported by higher PETS-C Brief scores observed in younger age (P=0.006) and higher educational attainment (P=0.023). No significant associations were observed between working-related characteristics and PETS-C Brief score.

Conclusions:

The satisfactory validity and reliability suggested the PETS-C Brief could be deployed for assessing perception of eHealth technology in Chinese nurses. Studies in large and random samples and in other cultural settings are warranted to increase the generalizability of our results.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jilili A, Weng X, Maimaiti P, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Liao L, Zhao SZ, Wang L, Guo N

Validation of the Perception of eHealth Technology Scale in Chinese Brief (PETS-C Brief) in Nurses: Survey Study

JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e79594

DOI: 10.2196/79594

PMID: 41191959

PMCID: 12588618

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.