Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jul 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 12, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Designing a Substance Misuse Data Dashboard for Overdose Fatality Review Teams: User-Centered Design Approach

Pisani M, Oguss MK, Dickson-Gomez J, Kostelac C, Parry A, Moss SH, Salisbury-Afshar E, Patterson BW, Spigner MF, Gussick M, Krautkramer A, Gruenloh T, Safipour Afshar A, Gupta P, Mayampurath A, Afshar M

Designing a Substance Misuse Data Dashboard for Overdose Fatality Review Teams: User-Centered Design Approach

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e79407

DOI: 10.2196/79407

PMID: 41538509

PMCID: 12806594

Designing a Substance Misuse Data Dashboard for Overdose Fatality Review Teams: User-Centered Design Approach

  • Marie Pisani; 
  • Madeline K Oguss; 
  • Julia Dickson-Gomez; 
  • Constance Kostelac; 
  • Amy Parry; 
  • Starr H Moss; 
  • Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar; 
  • Brian W Patterson; 
  • Michael F Spigner; 
  • Megan Gussick; 
  • Alison Krautkramer; 
  • Tim Gruenloh; 
  • Askar Safipour Afshar; 
  • Preeti Gupta; 
  • Anoop Mayampurath; 
  • Majid Afshar

ABSTRACT

Background:

Overdose Fatality Review (OFR) is a public health process in which cases of fatal overdose are carefully reviewed to identify prevention strategies. Current OFR requires review of multiple unconnected data sources, which is a manually intensive process.

Objective:

We aimed to use human factors design principles to develop a comprehensive dashboard that could facilitate enhanced processes to support OFR.

Methods:

We first surveyed OFR leaders in Wisconsin using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and conducted semi-structured interviews to identify targets for workflow optimization. Next, we developed a prototype dashboard for evaluation using a synthetic dataset built with Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT-4). We subsequently performed iterative design sessions with heuristic evaluations, and end-user feedback on the final prototype was obtained via targeted surveys and semi-structured interviews.

Results:

The NASA-TLX revealed a moderately high mental workload with the current workflow. Interviews affirmed that technological challenges and reliance on manual processes were contributory. The prototype dashboard addressed these concerns by integrating multiple data sources to generate population-level visualizations and patient-level event timelines. End-users reported the potential for improved efficiency and data accessibility compared to antecedent processes.

Conclusions:

OFR is a data-intensive process that traditionally demands substantial manual effort. The data dashboard offers an informatics-based approach to streamline data aggregation and presentation, potentially enhancing the efficiency of case reviews. Implementing a dashboard that consolidates and visualizes disparate data sources has the potential to alleviate the manual workload in overdose fatality review.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pisani M, Oguss MK, Dickson-Gomez J, Kostelac C, Parry A, Moss SH, Salisbury-Afshar E, Patterson BW, Spigner MF, Gussick M, Krautkramer A, Gruenloh T, Safipour Afshar A, Gupta P, Mayampurath A, Afshar M

Designing a Substance Misuse Data Dashboard for Overdose Fatality Review Teams: User-Centered Design Approach

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e79407

DOI: 10.2196/79407

PMID: 41538509

PMCID: 12806594

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.