Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Sex Differences in Medical Specialist Physicians’ Electronic Health Record In-Basket Workloads and the Implications for Compensation and Equity: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Nadkarni A, Glick L, Becker M, Healy M, Stein D, Heydarpour M, Rotenstein LS

Sex Differences in Medical Specialist Physicians’ Electronic Health Record In-Basket Workloads and the Implications for Compensation and Equity: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e79172

DOI: 10.2196/79172

PMID: 41707189

PMCID: 12961384

Medical Specialist Physicians’ EHR In-Basket Workload Differs by Sex: Implications for Compensation and Equity

  • Ashwini Nadkarni; 
  • Laura Glick; 
  • Molly Becker; 
  • Michael Healy; 
  • David Stein; 
  • Mahyar Heydarpour; 
  • Lisa S Rotenstein

ABSTRACT

Background:

Prior research has shown that female physicians in primary care receive a higher volume of patient and staff messages in the electronic health record (EHR) in-basket.

Objective:

We expanded on these findings in this cross-sectional study, assessing gender differences in in-basket messages generated by outpatient care workflows among internal medicine specialists and relative to RVUs - a traditional measure of clinical productivity that can determine compensation for ambulatory physicians.

Methods:

We collected monthly, ambulatory in-basket physician data and patient characteristics from Epic for January through March 2021 and normalized monthly in-basket burden measures by monthly RVUs. We obtained physician gender, rank, and practice years from the public institutional directory. Specialties were categorized as including a substantial procedural component (cardiology, gastroenterology, pulmonology) versus those predominantly not procedural (genetics, geriatrics, hematology, immunology, infectious disease, nephrology, palliative care, rheumatology, sleep medicine). We compared unadjusted in-basket burden measures by gender using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. To assess persistence of gender differences in in-basket burden after multivariate adjustment, we built models with in-basket burden outcomes as dependent variables; physician sex as the independent variable; and five covariates: physician demographics (academic rank, practice years); patient characteristics (age, problem number); and panel size (number of unique patients each physician evaluated and managed in each month). We excluded physicians with incomplete covariate data to more reliably calculate per-RVU workload measures. We performed likelihood ratio and bootstrapping tests to assess gender effect in a first model with all specialties, and in a second model with predominantly procedural specialties excluded.

Results:

We found that female physicians in internal medicine specialties spent more time on all in-basket activities and received a higher number of staff and patient messages per RVU.

Conclusions:

Women physicians in ambulatory medical specialties face a greater burden of in-basket work per every unit of paid clinical care. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nadkarni A, Glick L, Becker M, Healy M, Stein D, Heydarpour M, Rotenstein LS

Sex Differences in Medical Specialist Physicians’ Electronic Health Record In-Basket Workloads and the Implications for Compensation and Equity: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e79172

DOI: 10.2196/79172

PMID: 41707189

PMCID: 12961384

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.