Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mentalizing Without a Mind: Psychotherapeutic Potential of Generative AI

Yirmiya K, Fonagy P

Mentalizing Without a Mind: Psychotherapeutic Potential of Generative AI

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e79156

DOI: 10.2196/79156

PMID: 41071597

PMCID: 12552810

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Mentalizing without a mind: Exploring the potential of the psychotherapeutic skills of generative AI

  • Karen Yirmiya; 
  • Peter Fonagy

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into psychotherapeutic practice through the lens of mentalization theory, focusing particularly on epistemic trust - a critical relational mechanism facilitating psychological change. We critically examine AI’s capability to replicate core therapeutic components, such as empathy, embodied mentalizing, biobehavioural synchrony, and reciprocal mentalizing. Although current AI systems, especially large language models (LLMs), demonstrate significant potential in simulating emotional responsiveness, cognitive empathy, and therapeutic dialogue, fundamental limitations persist. AI’s inherent lack of genuine emotional presence, reciprocal intentionality, and affective commitment constrains its ability to foster authentic epistemic trust and meaningful therapeutic relationships. Additionally, we outline significant risks, notably for individuals with complex trauma or relational vulnerabilities, highlighting concerns regarding pseudo-empathy, mistaking phenomenal experience for objective reality (psychic equivalence), fruitless ungrounded pursuit of social understanding (hypermentalization), and epistemic exploitation of individuals in whom artificial understanding by AI triggers excessive credulity. Nonetheless, we propose ethically informed pathways for integrating AI to enhance clinical practice, therapist training, and client care, particularly in augmenting human capacities within group and adjunctive therapy contexts. Paradoxically, AI could support psychotherapist in improving their capacity to mentalize, improve their understanding of their clients, and provide such understanding within the moral constraints that normally govern their work. The paper calls for careful ethical regulation similar to that limiting genetic manipulation, interdisciplinary research, and clinician involvement in shaping future AI-based psychotherapeutic models, emphasising that AI’s role should complement rather than replace the irreplaceable relational core of psychotherapy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yirmiya K, Fonagy P

Mentalizing Without a Mind: Psychotherapeutic Potential of Generative AI

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e79156

DOI: 10.2196/79156

PMID: 41071597

PMCID: 12552810

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.