Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 24, 2025 - Aug 19, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 10, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study

Bladt L, Nieuwhof-Leppink A, Blomme RF, Vermeulen J, Vermandel A, De Win G, Van Campenhout L

Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e79142

DOI: 10.2196/79142

PMID: 41100523

PMCID: 12530337

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study

  • Lola Bladt; 
  • Anka Nieuwhof-Leppink; 
  • Rose-Farah Blomme; 
  • Jiri Vermeulen; 
  • Alexandra Vermandel; 
  • Gunter De Win; 
  • Lukas Van Campenhout

ABSTRACT

Background:

Standard urotherapy for childhood incontinence involves traditional tools like paper bladder diaries, timer watches, wetting alarms and uroflowmeters. However, little is known about how these tools are experienced by today’s digitally native children.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore how children undergoing urotherapy perceive and experience these commonly used tools, with the goal of informing more engaging and child-centered design approaches.

Methods:

A qualitative focus group design was used with purposive sampling of children undergoing in-clinic urotherapy group training. Nineteen participants (13 boys, 6 girls) aged 9–13 years, took part in focus groups of 3 to 4 children, held at the hospital. A child-friendly focus group toolkit was used to facilitate discussion through creative and playful exercises. Seven focus groups were conducted, including two repeated sessions, until thematic saturation was reached. All sessions were held in Dutch, video- and audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. An inductive conventional content analysis was conducted using a dual-coder approach to identify and iteratively refine emerging themes.

Results:

Four themes emerged: (1) Attitudes and Motivation: ranging from willingness to engage in urotherapy and use tools, to reluctance or resistance; (2) Social Acceptance: highlighting the impact of peer perception, fear of being bullied, and opportunities to break the taboo and reframe tools as socially desirable; (3) Contextual Influences: including dissatisfaction with school toilets and limited child involvement at doctor visits, contrasted with the positive peer support experienced during group therapy; (4) Digital Integration: children saw many traditional tools as outdated and suggested gamified, smart alternatives. The drawings created by children during the exercises served as a creative reflection of these thematic findings.

Conclusions:

Involving children in research and development is essential for creating interventions that are truly child-centered. Through creative, qualitative methods, this study uncovered rich insights into children’s experiences with urotherapy tools, pointing to four key design priorities: personalization, stigma-free design, adaptability, and digital innovation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bladt L, Nieuwhof-Leppink A, Blomme RF, Vermeulen J, Vermandel A, De Win G, Van Campenhout L

Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e79142

DOI: 10.2196/79142

PMID: 41100523

PMCID: 12530337

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.