Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 16, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 18, 2025 - Aug 13, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 29, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

GrantCheck—an AI Solution for Guiding Grant Language to New Policy Requirements: Development Study

Shi Q, Oztekin A, Matthew G, Bortle J, Jenkins HM, Wong S, Langlois P, Zaki A, Coleman B, Luzuriaga K, Zai AH

GrantCheck—an AI Solution for Guiding Grant Language to New Policy Requirements: Development Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e79038

DOI: 10.2196/79038

PMID: 41308189

PMCID: 12699247

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

GrantCheck: AI Solution for Guiding Grant Language to New Policy Requirements: Development Study

  • Qiming Shi; 
  • Asil Oztekin; 
  • George Matthew; 
  • Jeffrey Bortle; 
  • Hayden M Jenkins; 
  • Steven Wong; 
  • Paul Langlois; 
  • Anaheed Zaki; 
  • Brian Coleman; 
  • Katherine Luzuriaga; 
  • Adrian H Zai

ABSTRACT

Background:

Academic institutions face increasing challenges in grant writing due to evolving federal and state policies that restrict the use of specific language. Manual review processes are labor-intensive and may delay submissions, highlighting the need for scalable, secure solutions that ensure compliance without compromising scientific integrity.

Objective:

To develop a secure, AI-powered tool that assists researchers in writing grants consistent with evolving state and federal policy requirements.

Methods:

GrantCheck was built on a private AWS Virtual Private Cloud, integrating a rule-based natural language processing engine with large language models (LLMs) accessed via Amazon Bedrock. A hybrid pipeline detects flagged terms and generates alternative phrasing, with validation steps to prevent hallucinations. A secure web-based front end enables document upload and report retrieval. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale.

Results:

GrantCheck achieved high performance in detecting and recommending alternatives for sensitive terms, with a precision of 1.000, recall of 0.73, and an F1 score of 0.84—outperforming general-purpose models including GPT-4o (F1 = 0.43), Deepseek R1 (F1 = 0.40), Llama 3.1 (F1 = 0.27), Gemini 2.5 Flash (F1 = 0.58), and even Gemini 2.5 Pro (F1 = 0.72). Usability testing among 16 faculty and staff participants yielded a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 82.2, indicating a positive user satisfaction with the tool’s interface, functionality, and workflow integration.

Conclusions:

GrantCheck demonstrates the feasibility of deploying institutionally hosted, AI-driven systems to support compliant and researcher-friendly grant writing. Its hybrid architecture ensures high performance and privacy while reducing administrative burden in navigating shifting language policies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shi Q, Oztekin A, Matthew G, Bortle J, Jenkins HM, Wong S, Langlois P, Zaki A, Coleman B, Luzuriaga K, Zai AH

GrantCheck—an AI Solution for Guiding Grant Language to New Policy Requirements: Development Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e79038

DOI: 10.2196/79038

PMID: 41308189

PMCID: 12699247

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.