Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 10, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How and Why Telehealth Interventions Improve Self-Care Among Vulnerable Groups of Patients With Heart Failure: Scoping Review and Rapid Realist Synthesis

Allana S, Norris C, Hussain A, Alaidarous N, Haider RM, Clark A

How and Why Telehealth Interventions Improve Self-Care Among Vulnerable Groups of Patients With Heart Failure: Scoping Review and Rapid Realist Synthesis

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e78859

DOI: 10.2196/78859

PMID: 41730258

PMCID: 12928719

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

How and Why Telehealth Interventions Work for Improving Self-Care among Vulnerable Groups of Heart Failure Patients: A Rapid Realist Synthesis

  • Saleema Allana; 
  • Colleen Norris; 
  • Armish Hussain; 
  • Nada Alaidarous; 
  • Raza Muhammad Haider; 
  • Alex Clark

ABSTRACT

Background:

Heart Failure (HF) is a prevalent condition among older adults in Canada, often leading to reduced quality of life and frequent hospitalizations. Heart Failure Disease Management Interventions (HFDMIs), particularly those delivered through telehealth, aim to improve care by fostering self-care and reducing readmissions. However, disparities in access and utilization of heart failure telehealth services persist within marginalized populations.

Objective:

The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a scoping review and a rapid realist synthesis around HF telehealth interventions for vulnerable groups of patients with HF. This review is underpinned by the meta-theory of CR and intersectionality theory.

Methods:

A rapid realist synthesis was undertaken for the retrieved literature to explore the underlying mechanisms and contexts that make HF telehealth interventions work or not work for marginalized groups of HF patients.

Results:

The realist review findings indicate that vulnerable patients require simple interventions. The findings also suggest that for effective utilization of telehealth and remote monitoring services, these patients require simplified training that could increase their confidence. The review findings have also demonstrated that involving patients’ family members in the delivery of telehealth interventions ensures success.

Conclusions:

Future research with vulnerable populations should be underpinned by the critical/ intersectionality theory and should apply the principles of intersectionality at all stages of the research process, including evaluation and analysis. This review also urges HF practitioners to apply the principles of intersectionality and health equity in clinical practice, such that the interventions are simple, personalized, involve family members, include an in-person component, include patients’ and health professionals’ training, and integrate telemonitoring data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Allana S, Norris C, Hussain A, Alaidarous N, Haider RM, Clark A

How and Why Telehealth Interventions Improve Self-Care Among Vulnerable Groups of Patients With Heart Failure: Scoping Review and Rapid Realist Synthesis

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e78859

DOI: 10.2196/78859

PMID: 41730258

PMCID: 12928719

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.