Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 21, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Detecting Perceived Unfair Treatment Among US College Students Using Mobile Sensing: Pilot Machine Learning Study

Ren Y, Mulukutla R, Mankoff J, Dey AK

Detecting Perceived Unfair Treatment Among US College Students Using Mobile Sensing: Pilot Machine Learning Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e78657

DOI: 10.2196/78657

PMID: 41172295

PMCID: 12619020

Detecting Perceived Unfair Treatment among U.S. College Students Using Mobile Sensing: Pilot Machine Learning Study

  • Yiyi Ren; 
  • Raghu Mulukutla; 
  • Jennifer Mankoff; 
  • Anind K. Dey

ABSTRACT

Background:

Experiences of unfair treatment on college campuses are linked to adverse mental and physical health outcomes, highlighting the need for interventions. However, detecting such experiences relies mainly on self-reports. No prior research has examined the feasibility of using mobile sensing via smartphones and wearables for the passive detection of these experiences.

Objective:

This pilot study explores the potential of using passive sensing to infer daily experiences of perceived unfair treatment. It aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models against naive baselines and establish a benchmark for future research.

Methods:

We analyzed data from 201 undergraduate students collected over two 10-week academic terms in 2018. Perceived unfair treatment was self-reported at the daily level via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys, with 413 of 9629 total responses (< 5%) indicating unfair treatment. We implemented two modeling approaches with distinct training schemes: (a) supervised classification models trained in a user-independent manner using data from different individuals, and (b) anomaly detection models trained in a user-dependent manner using historical data from the same individuals. Classification performance was assessed using stratified group 5-fold cross-validation for user-independent models and a chronological train-test split for user-dependent models.

Results:

Of the 201 study participants, 110 reported experiencing unfair treatment at least once. On average, participants reported unfair treatment in 4.66% of their EMA responses (95% CI: 3.13% to 6.19%). User-independent classification models showed mixed performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 and F1 scores between 0.07 and 0.16. Among them, LightGBM performed best and outperformed the demographic baseline. In contrast, user-dependent anomaly detection models performed better, with the multi-day LSTM-AE model achieving the highest performance (precision: 0.27, recall: 0.84, F1: 0.41), outperforming naive baselines. Feature importance analysis identified key behavioral patterns for population-level detection, including increased time spent off campus, elevated evening and nighttime activity, reduced indoor mobility on campus, prolonged screen usage, delayed sleep onset, and shorter sleep duration.

Conclusions:

Mobile sensing shows promise for detecting daily experiences of perceived unfair treatment in college students and identifying associated behavioral patterns. Our findings highlight opportunities for timely interventions through mobile technology to mitigate the impact of these experiences on students’ mental health and well-being.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ren Y, Mulukutla R, Mankoff J, Dey AK

Detecting Perceived Unfair Treatment Among US College Students Using Mobile Sensing: Pilot Machine Learning Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e78657

DOI: 10.2196/78657

PMID: 41172295

PMCID: 12619020

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.