Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Jun 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 3, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 3, 2026
Improving Clinical Decision-Making in Treating Airway Diseases with an Expert System Built Upon the Free AI Tool Google NotebookLM®
ABSTRACT
Objective:
We employed the free artificial intelligence (AI) tool Google NotebookLM®, powered by the large language model (LLM) Gemini 2.0, to construct a medical decision-making aid for diagnosing and managing airway diseases, and subsequently evaluated its functionality and performance in clinical workflow.
Methods:
After feeding this tool with relevant published clinical guidelines for these diseases, we evaluated the feasibility of the system regarding its behavior, ability, and potential, and made simulated cases and used this system to solve associated medical problems. The test and simulation questions were designed by a pulmonologist, and the appropriateness (focusing on accuracy and completeness) of AI responses were judged by three pulmonologists independently. The system was then deployed in an emergency department (ED) setting, where it was tested by medical staff (n=20) to see how it affected the process of clinical consultation. Test opinions were collected through questionnaire.
Results:
Most (58/84=66.7%) of the specialists’ ratings regarding AI responses were above average. The inter-rater reliability was moderate on accuracy (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.612, P<.001) and good on completeness (ICC=0.773, P<.001). When deployed in an ED setting, this system could respond with reasonable answers, enhance the literacy of personnel about these diseases. The potential to save the time spent in consultation did not reach statistical significance (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D=.223, P=.237>.05) across all participants, but indicated a favorable outcome if we analyzed only physicians’ responses.
Conclusions:
This system is customizable, cost-efficient, and accessible by clinicians and allied professionals without any computer coding experience in treating airway diseases. It provides convincing guideline-based recommendations, increases the staff’s medical literacy, and potentially saves physicians’ time spent on consultation. It warrants further evaluation in other medical disciplines and healthcare environments.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.