Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jun 2, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 29, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Mechanism of Online Health Information Seeking Switching to Online Medical Consultation: Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Internet healthcare plays a crucial role in addressing the challenge of distributing high-quality medical resources and promoting the optimal allocation of these resources and health equity in China. Online medical consultation plays a more significant role than online health information seeking. Currently, the proportion of Chinese patients using Online medical consultation is low. Therefore, it is essential to enhance patient engagement with OMC and fully leverage the role of Internet healthcare in optimizing the allocation of medical resources.
Objective:
Exploring the correlation mechanisms of online medical community users' switching behaviors from online health information seeking to online medical consultation.
Methods:
This study is based on the KAP theory, which combines the social support theory and the health belief model to construct a research model of users' willingness to transition from online health information seeking to online medical consultation. The study adopts a questionnaire survey and structural equation modeling method to conduct an empirical study.
Results:
Gaining knowledge about information support has a significant positive impact on perceived susceptibility (β=0.339, p<0.001), perceived severity (β=0.33948, p<0.001), and perceived benefits (β=0.361, p<0.001), while having a significant negative impact on perceived barriers (β=-0.285, p<0.001). Gaining knowledge about emotional support positively affects perceived susceptibility (β=0.220, p<0.001) and perceived benefits (β=0.149, p<0.01), but does not significantly influence perceived severity (β=-0.006, p>0.05) or perceived barriers (β=0.099, p>0.05). Perceived susceptibility (β=0.17123, p<0.015), perceived severity (β=0.174, p<0.001), and perceived benefits (β=0.273, p<0.0) positively influence patients' transition to online consultation behavior, whereas perceived barriers (β=-0.112, p<0.05) negatively impact this switch. Additionally, we found that gaining knowledge about information support not only directly affects patients' behavior in switching to online consultations but also impacts patients' online medical consultations through perceived susceptibility (14.23%), perceived severity (13.17%), and perceived benefits (25.28%). In contrast, gaining knowledge about emotional support does not directly influence patient behavior transfer; it only operates through perceived susceptibility (46.95%) and perceived benefit (52.90%).
Conclusions:
This study integrated the knowledge-attitude-behavior framework, social support theory, and health belief model to uncover the internal logic of patients' behavioral transfers within online health communities. It confirmed the mediating role of the cognitive-emotional dual-drive pathway and health beliefs. The findings provide a scientific basis for the functional design of online healthcare platforms and for precise health knowledge dissemination strategies. Clinical Trial: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinxiang Medical University (212102310499).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.