Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Jun 2, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 6, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Nurses’ Expectations of a Knowledge Management System in Nursing Practice: Qualitative Study

Vogt M, Müller S, Jagfeld G, Ranegger R, Zürcher S, Vetsch J

Nurses’ Expectations of a Knowledge Management System in Nursing Practice: Qualitative Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e78395

DOI: 10.2196/78395

PMID: 41564275

PMCID: 12822857

Nurses’ expectations of a knowledge management system in nursing practice: a qualitative study

  • Magdalena Vogt; 
  • Sebastian Müller; 
  • Glorianna Jagfeld; 
  • Renate Ranegger; 
  • Sabin Zürcher; 
  • Janine Vetsch

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evidence-based practice is essential for delivering safe, high-quality nursing care, yet its implementation remains challenging due to barriers such as limited knowledge, lack of supportive organizational culture, and insufficient access to relevant knowledge at the point of care. Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) have the potential to bridge this gap by integrating evidence into the nursing process through technological support. Despite growing interest, the integration of KMS into daily nursing practice is still underexplored, especially from the perspective of frontline nurses.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to explore nurses’ perspectives on the requirements for a KMS that supports evidence-based practice at the point of care, with a focus on usability, process-integration into the electronic nursing care plan and patient chart, and implementation challenges and benefits.

Methods:

A qualitative study was conducted in a Swiss hospital using observations, focus-groups and individual interviews with six registered nurses, nine advanced practice nurses, two nursing managers and one head physician. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results:

The analysis revealed four main- and 10 subcategories, including the following: (1) Content of KMS, (2) Personal and structural factors of knowledge management, (3) Technical conditions of KMS, and (4) Implementation of a KMS. Participants emphasized the need for an intuitively structured, process-integrated system that links evidence-based information directly to the nursing interventions in the electronic nursing care plan and patient chart. Organizational support, interprofessional collaboration, and clear responsibilities were identified as critical for successful implementation.

Conclusions:

There is a clear need for a KMS that is user-friendly, seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows, and supports quick, reliable access to evidence-based knowledge. A KMS could enhance nurses’ access to reliable knowledge, promote evidence-based decision-making, and strengthen professional confidence at the point of care. Such systems may improve information retrieval and contribute to safer, more consistent nursing practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vogt M, Müller S, Jagfeld G, Ranegger R, Zürcher S, Vetsch J

Nurses’ Expectations of a Knowledge Management System in Nursing Practice: Qualitative Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e78395

DOI: 10.2196/78395

PMID: 41564275

PMCID: 12822857

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.