Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 11, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 20, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of AI in Hepatic Steatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Song J, Liu D, Li J, Cong H, Deng R, Lu Y, Sun J, Zhang J

Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of AI in Hepatic Steatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e78310

DOI: 10.2196/78310

PMID: 41529075

PMCID: 12798848

Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Hepatic Steatosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Jiamei Song; 
  • Dan Liu; 
  • Jitong Li; 
  • Haoru Cong; 
  • Ruixue Deng; 
  • Yihan Lu; 
  • Jiayi Sun; 
  • Jingzhou Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The steadily rising global incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has garnered considerable concern within the international medical community. Although noninvasive imaging techniques offer the advantages of being painless and highly reproducible, they remain substantially limited in their ability to accurately quantify the degree of hepatic steatosis (HS). Therefore, histopathological examination of liver tissue remains the “gold standard” for diagnosis. The fast advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is reshaping paradigms in medical image analysis and presents fresh opportunities for the intelligent HS identification and grading.

Objective:

Our study endeavors to evaluate the diagnosis performance and clinical utility of AI-enabled models in HS assessment via a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, thereby providing evidence-based support for their potential clinical translation.

Methods:

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE were thoroughly retrieved to screen out eligible studies. Extracted outcomes were the area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, as well as false positive/negative rates. Data from qualified studies were synthesized for our meta-analysis.

Results:

32 studies were eligible for systematic review, of which 29 were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled sensitivity was 95% (95% CI: 92–96%), specificity was 92% (95% CI: 90–94%), and the pooled AUC was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.94). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of AI employed (machine learning (ML) vs deep learning (DL)), reference standard (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction, liver histopathology, ultrasonography (US)), imaging modality (US, computed tomography(CT), histology), and application of transfer learning (TL).

Conclusions:

This meta-analysis demonstrates the high diagnostic efficacy of AI in HS evaluation. Nevertheless, the clinical implementation of such technologies remains constrained by challenges related to data quality, model architecture, and validation frameworks. With continued refinement of algorithmic design, standardization of data acquisition protocols, and promotion of interdisciplinary collaboration, AI holds considerable promise as a pivotal tool for precise metabolic liver disease diagnosis and management, ultimately contributing to the alleviation of the growing global burden of hepatic disorders. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO number: CRD420251046862


 Citation

Please cite as:

Song J, Liu D, Li J, Cong H, Deng R, Lu Y, Sun J, Zhang J

Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of AI in Hepatic Steatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e78310

DOI: 10.2196/78310

PMID: 41529075

PMCID: 12798848

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.