Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 24, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Screen Time and Chronic Pain Health: Mendelian Randomization Study

Jiang J, Pu C, Cai J, Yu C, Xiao C, Liu Z

Screen Time and Chronic Pain Health: Mendelian Randomization Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e78233

DOI: 10.2196/78233

PMID: 41661662

PMCID: 12930148

Screen Time and Chronic Pain Health: A Mendelian Randomization Study

  • Jiahui Jiang; 
  • Chunyan Pu; 
  • Jiarui Cai; 
  • Chuan Yu; 
  • Chenghan Xiao; 
  • Zhenmi Liu

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid proliferation of electronic devices has increased screen time, raising concerns about its potential health effects, including chronic pain. However, existing studies have limitations in scope and causal inference, with inconsistent findings and a lack of biological mechanism exploration.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to investigate the causal associations and shared genetic mechanisms between different forms of screen time and various chronic pain phenotypes.

Methods:

Leveraging genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, we investigate the association and shared biological mechanisms between screen time (Time spent watching television, Time spent using computer, and Length of mobile phone use) and chronic pain phenotypes (including multisite chronic pain (MCP), back, knee, neck/shoulder, hip pain, and headaches). Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis were performed to examine associations between screen time and chronic pain. Summary-data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR), Transcriptome-Wide Association Study (TWAS), and colocalization analysis were utilized to identify the shared genes and potential mechanisms.

Results:

MR analysis revealed that Time spent watching television and Length of mobile phone use were positively associated with several types of chronic pain, while Time spent using computer showed a negative association. Specifically, Time spent watching television was positively associated with the risk of MCP (OR=1.6081, P=1.05×10-31), back pain (OR=1.1370, P=2.41×10-8), knee pain (OR=1.0914, P=7.10×10-6), neck/shoulder pain and hip pain. Length of mobile phone use was positively associated with the risk of MCP (OR=1.2200, P=2.15×10-5), headaches and neck/shoulder pain. However, Time spent using computer was negatively associated with the risk of MCP (OR=0.8322, P=0.0005), back pain and knee pain. Integrative three analysis methods identified overlapping genes, with CEP170 emerging as a key gene consistently supported by SMR, TWAS, and colocalization analysis in the relationship between Time spent using computer and MCP.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrate an association between screen time and various aspects of chronic pain. The CEP170 gene may be the biological basis for the association between Time spent using computer and MCP risk. These results provide intriguing targets for further research into the mechanisms.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jiang J, Pu C, Cai J, Yu C, Xiao C, Liu Z

Screen Time and Chronic Pain Health: Mendelian Randomization Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e78233

DOI: 10.2196/78233

PMID: 41661662

PMCID: 12930148

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.