Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: May 23, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 17, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial

Mora Ringle V, Jensen-Doss A

A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e78003

DOI: 10.2196/78003

PMID: 41604662

PMCID: 12851564

A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Vanesa Mora Ringle; 
  • Amanda Jensen-Doss

ABSTRACT

Background:

Widespread misinformation and low critical health literacy pose major barriers to public health worldwide. Rapid, scalable interventions are urgently needed to strengthen the public’s ability to make informed health decisions.

Objective:

Informed by critical health literacy frameworks, we developed and tested a brief, story-based critical thinking podcast, Parents Making Informed Health Choices, designed to improve health literacy and decision-making among U.S. parents.

Methods:

In a two-arm randomized controlled trial (N=250) conducted with a diverse national sample of parents recruited online, participants were randomly assigned to listen to either the critical thinking podcast (n=128) or a control podcast (n=122). The experimental podcast delivered nine evidence-based practice principles embedded in relatable scenarios about mental and physical health. Primary outcomes included critical thinking about health claims, intended health behaviors, attitudes toward evidence-based mental health practices, and treatment preferences.

Results:

Compared to the control group, parents who listened to the critical thinking podcast demonstrated significantly improved critical thinking about health information (p<.001), more critical thinking–aligned intended behaviors (p<.01), stronger attitudes in favor of evidence-based mental health practices (p<.05), and more evidence-informed treatment preferences (p<.05).

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that a short, story-based podcast can meaningfully improve critical thinking about health among U.S. parents. Podcasts may offer a scalable, accessible public health tool to counter misinformation and enhance critical health literacy in online populations. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mora Ringle V, Jensen-Doss A

A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e78003

DOI: 10.2196/78003

PMID: 41604662

PMCID: 12851564

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.