Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 26, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 27, 2025 - Jul 22, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The 5 R’s of Indigenous Research as a Framework to Co-Design and Evaluate an Outdoor Play Program in Early Learning and Child Care Centers: Protocol for the Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 Wait-List Control Cluster Randomized Trial

Brussoni M, Ramsden R, Grieve S, Mount D, Fox E, Herrington S, Lin Y, Johnson SE, Lloyd J, Hill T, Elliot E, Mlieczko E, Lemire A, Scott L, Barrett A, Cottier E, Rice A

The 5 R’s of Indigenous Research as a Framework to Co-Design and Evaluate an Outdoor Play Program in Early Learning and Child Care Centers: Protocol for the Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 Wait-List Control Cluster Randomized Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e77956

DOI: 10.2196/77956

PMID: 41385788

PMCID: 12743237

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Five R’s of Indigenous Research as a framework to co-design and evaluate an outdoor play program in early learning and child care centres: Protocol for the PROmoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 wait-list control cluster randomized trial

  • Mariana Brussoni; 
  • Rachel Ramsden; 
  • Sheila Grieve; 
  • Dawn Mount; 
  • Emily Fox; 
  • Susan Herrington; 
  • Yingyi Lin; 
  • Stella Erasmus Johnson; 
  • Jean Lloyd; 
  • Trudy Hill; 
  • Enid Elliot; 
  • Emily Mlieczko; 
  • Andrea Lemire; 
  • Laranna Scott; 
  • Ashley Barrett; 
  • Emma Cottier; 
  • Ally Rice

ABSTRACT

Background:

Outdoor play has always been a fundamental part of childhood. Children’s participation in outdoor play connects them to nature, the land and supports their role in the natural world. Early learning and child care (ELCC) centres provide important opportunities for outdoor play, however, barriers towards the provision of outdoor play opportunities exist, including educator attitudes, existing policies and procedures, outdoor space limitations and adverse weather conditions.

Objective:

The PROmoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 study is a community-based research partnership with Indigenous Knowledge Keepers and Elders, Indigenous and early childhood organizations, early childhood education faculty, ELCC centres and families, aiming to expand outdoor play in ELCC centres. This paper provides a detailed overview of the community-based design process, guided by the 5 R’s – Respect, Relevance, Responsibility, Reciprocity and Relationship – and the resulting study protocol for the mixed methods wait-list control cluster randomized trial.

Methods:

The PRO-ECO program and study protocol are implemented in partnership with 10 ELCC centres delivering licensed full-day, year-round care to children aged 2.5-6 years in rural and urban areas of British Columbia, Canada. The PRO-ECO program includes four components to address the common barriers to outdoor play in ELCC settings. Primary outcome measures include the proportion and diversity of observed nature play behaviour during dedicated outdoor times at ELCC centres as measured through observational behaviour mapping. Secondary outcomes include changes in educator attitudes, quality of ELCC outdoor play space, and children’s perspectives of their experiences at ELCC centres. Outcome data are collected at baseline, and 6-months and 12-months post-baseline. The community’s perspectives (educators, children, families) of the project are assessed qualitatively to understand the acceptability and effect of the PRO-ECO program. Mixed-effect models will test the effect of the PRO-ECO program on quantitative outcomes. Qualitative data will support interpretation of quantitative findings and provide evidence on project acceptability.

Results:

Participant recruitment for this study began in August 2023 and data collection was completed at participating ELCC centres in March 2025. A total of 227 children, 90 early childhood educators and 40 family members were recruited to participate in this study.

Conclusions:

The PRO-ECO 2.0 study ruses a rigorous and robust experimental design within a community-based research project. The 5 R’s approach grounded our work in shared values, disrupting traditional academic power relations and weaving together Indigenous and Western worldviews in the context of academic research. Clinical Trial: NCT05626595


 Citation

Please cite as:

Brussoni M, Ramsden R, Grieve S, Mount D, Fox E, Herrington S, Lin Y, Johnson SE, Lloyd J, Hill T, Elliot E, Mlieczko E, Lemire A, Scott L, Barrett A, Cottier E, Rice A

The 5 R’s of Indigenous Research as a Framework to Co-Design and Evaluate an Outdoor Play Program in Early Learning and Child Care Centers: Protocol for the Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 Wait-List Control Cluster Randomized Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e77956

DOI: 10.2196/77956

PMID: 41385788

PMCID: 12743237

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.