Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: May 22, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 22, 2025 - Jul 17, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 3, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validity of Heart Rate Measurement Using Wearable Devices During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective Pilot Validation Study

Kitagaki K, Hongo Y, Futai R, Hasegawa T, Morikawa H, Shimoyama H

Validity of Heart Rate Measurement Using Wearable Devices During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective Pilot Validation Study

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e77911

DOI: 10.2196/77911

PMID: 41052425

PMCID: 12605283

Validity of Heart Rate Measurement Using Wearable Devices During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Pilot Validation Study

  • Kazufumi Kitagaki; 
  • Yuji Hongo; 
  • Rie Futai; 
  • Takeshi Hasegawa; 
  • Hiroshi Morikawa; 
  • Hisashi Shimoyama

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable devices present a promising alternative for remotely monitoring heart rate (HR) during home-based cardiac rehabilitation. However, evidence on their accuracy across different exercise intensities and patient profiles is limited, particularly in cardiovascular disease (CVD) populations such as those with heart failure (HF).

Objective:

To assess the accuracy of HR measurements obtained by the Fitbit Inspire 3 during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in patients with CVD.

Methods:

This single-center, prospective pilot study enrolled 30 patients with CVD undergoing CPX. HR was simultaneously recorded using electrocardiography (ECG) and the Fitbit Inspire 3 at 1-min intervals across different CPX phases, including rest, exercise below and above anaerobic threshold (AT), and recovery. The correlation between the two methods was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, while measurement error was determined by mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A MAPE of ≤10% was set as the cutoff for acceptable agreement.

Results:

The Fitbit Inspire 3 showed a strong overall correlation with ECG-derived HR (r = 0.90) and an acceptable MAPE of 5.40%. The underestimation rate reached 15.97% at above AT compared to 3.33% at rest. When stratified by HF stage (B vs. C), underestimation rates were more pronounced in patients with HF (5.09% vs. 11.27%).

Conclusions:

The Fitbit Inspire 3 demonstrates acceptable validity for HR monitoring during CPX in patients with CVD. Nonetheless, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting HR data during high-intensity exercise, particularly in patients with HF.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kitagaki K, Hongo Y, Futai R, Hasegawa T, Morikawa H, Shimoyama H

Validity of Heart Rate Measurement Using Wearable Devices During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective Pilot Validation Study

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e77911

DOI: 10.2196/77911

PMID: 41052425

PMCID: 12605283

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.