Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 21, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 12, 2025 - Aug 7, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventing Acute Care Use in Oncology Patients Following Systemic Therapy Using Medicare Claims Data: Retrospective Cohort Study

Keller SA, Schuessler M, Naderalvojoud B, Seto T, Tian L, Roy M, Hernandez-Boussard T

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventing Acute Care Use in Oncology Patients Following Systemic Therapy Using Medicare Claims Data: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e77891

DOI: 10.2196/77891

PMID: 41380118

PMCID: 12698071

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Cost-benefit analysis of acute care utilization prevention in post-therapy oncology patients using medicare claims data

  • Sara Alessandra Keller; 
  • Maximillian Schuessler; 
  • Behzad Naderalvojoud; 
  • Tina Seto; 
  • Lu Tian; 
  • Mohana Roy; 
  • Tina Hernandez-Boussard

ABSTRACT

Acute care utilization (ACU) stands for a major economic burden in oncology, which can ideally be prevented. Existing models effectively predict such events. We aim to quantify the cost savings achieved by implementing a model to predict ACU in oncology patients undergoing systemic therapy. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 20,556 patients at an academic medical center from 2010 to 2022. We included patients whose treatment began on day one of therapy, excluding those with known death dates within study period. Data on ACU-related expenses were gathered from Medicare claims and mapped to service codes in electronic health records, yielding average daily costs for each patient over 180 days. The exposure was an ACU event. The main outcome was the average daily cost per patient by the end of the first year of systemic therapy. The study included 20,556 patients. The average daily cost per patient with ACU was US $94.62 ± 72.54 (92.32, 96.92) (mean ± SD, 95% CI) and without ACU was $53.28 ± 59.92 (92.32, 54.19). The average total cost per ACU patient was US $17,031.92 ± 13,056.63 (16,616.74, 17,445.09), and $9,591.06 ± 10,785.83 (9,427.64, 9,754.48) for those without an ACU. Based on an average of 2,177 patients annually, the model predicts a savings of $910,000 in the first year, growing to $9.46 million over six years, with cumulative savings of $31.11 million. Predictive analytics can significantly reduce costs associated with ACU events, enhancing economic efficiency in cancer care. Further research is needed to explore potential health benefits.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Keller SA, Schuessler M, Naderalvojoud B, Seto T, Tian L, Roy M, Hernandez-Boussard T

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventing Acute Care Use in Oncology Patients Following Systemic Therapy Using Medicare Claims Data: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e77891

DOI: 10.2196/77891

PMID: 41380118

PMCID: 12698071

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.