Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: May 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 19, 2025 - Jul 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Linking Patient-Reported and Clinician-Assessed Wound Status via a Chatbot-Enabled Digital Surveillance for Wound Infection: A Formative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital health platforms that integrate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with wound image submissions offer new opportunities for remote wound surveillance. However, the alignment between patient-reported symptoms and physician clinical judgment remains underexplored, particularly in real-world settings.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PROM-reported wound infection in predicting physician-initiated callbacks and to explore the symptom features associated with patients' perception of infection.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. Patients with acute or chronic wounds were enrolled in a chatbot-assisted digital monitoring program between June 30, 2022, and March 1, 2023. Using their mobile devices, patients submitted wound photographs and completed a structured symptom checklist, including indicators such as redness, darkness, and infection. A senior plastic surgeon independently reviewed each image to determine the need for clinical follow-up (callback), which served as the reference outcome. The presence of “infection” in the PROM checklist served as the primary predictor. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to assess predictive accuracy. A secondary analysis examined associations between symptom features and infection reporting using logistic regression.
Results:
Among 2,297 wound image entries from 270 patients, PROM-reported infection showed high sensitivity (94.0%) and an AUC of 0.9575 (95% CI: 0.9502–0.9648) for predicting physician callbacks. In the acute wound subgroup, the AUC remained high (0.9335). Redness was the strongest correlate of infection reporting (OR = 31.6; 95% CI: 23.1–43.2), while skin darkness was negatively associated with perceived infection in acute wounds (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.203–0.850), indicating potential misinterpretation.
Conclusions:
Patient-reported infection through a digital platform demonstrated high sensitivity in identifying wounds requiring medical attention. However, notable false-negative rates and symptom misinterpretation underscore the need for improved patient education and real-time decision support. These findings support the utility of PROM-based systems for remote triage and highlight the importance of integrating patient-clinician feedback loops to enhance wound care safety.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.