Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 17, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Message Valence, Industry Influence, and Stakeholder Narratives in Global Conversations on Tobacco Harm Reduction: Content Analysis

Jun J, Zain A, Kim M, Thrasher J

Message Valence, Industry Influence, and Stakeholder Narratives in Global Conversations on Tobacco Harm Reduction: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e77676

DOI: 10.2196/77676

PMID: 41183321

PMCID: 12582543

Message Valence, Industry Influence, and Stakeholder Narratives in Global Conversations on Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Content Analysis

  • Jungmi Jun; 
  • Ali Zain; 
  • Minji Kim; 
  • Jim Thrasher

ABSTRACT

Tobacco harm reduction (THR) has become a prominent theme in global tobacco discourse, with much of the messaging driven by industry actors on social media. Despite its growing prevalence, empirical understanding of how THR is framed and debated online remains limited. This study analyzed 17,361 posts on X (formerly Twitter) from 87 countries between July 2019 and December 2023, examining message valence (pro-, anti-, mixed, or none), stakeholder participation, geographic and temporal variation, and industry involvement. Pro-THR posts constituted the majority (71.4%), surpassing anti-THR (22.6%) and neutral or mixed messages (6.0%). Pro-THR valence was most prevalent in high-income countries and largely driven by THR advocates, industry affiliates, and tobacco users. In contrast, anti-THR posts were more common among governments, tobacco control advocates, and in lower-middle-income regions. Thematic analysis revealed that pro-THR messages emphasized the safety and smoking cessation efficacy of newer nicotine and tobacco products, consumer rights, and distrust of public health entities. Conversely, anti-THR narratives focused on youth protection, the health risks of newer products, and distrust of industry motives, while advocating for complete cessation of all tobacco and nicotine use. Nearly 40% of THR-related posts mentioned newer products, and 16% included marketing attempts. Over the years, there have been notable increases in overall THR post volume, posts by THR advocates, as well as product mentions and marketing efforts—trends that present new challenges for tobacco regulation and public health.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jun J, Zain A, Kim M, Thrasher J

Message Valence, Industry Influence, and Stakeholder Narratives in Global Conversations on Tobacco Harm Reduction: Content Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e77676

DOI: 10.2196/77676

PMID: 41183321

PMCID: 12582543

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.