Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 22, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 25, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study

Zamir MT, Khan SU, Gelbukh A, Felipe Riverón EM, Gelbukh I

Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77482

DOI: 10.2196/77482

PMID: 40997754

PMCID: 12569488

Explainable AI-driven analysis of radiology reports using text and image data: An experimental study

  • Muhammad Tayyab Zamir; 
  • Safir Ullah Khan; 
  • Alexander Gelbukh; 
  • Edgardo Manuel Felipe Riverón; 
  • Irina Gelbukh

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into clinical diagnostics, yet its lack of transparency hinders trust and adoption among healthcare professionals. Explainable AI (XA1) offers a solution by making AI-driven decisions more interpretable and reliable for clinical use.

Objective:

This study seeks to evaluate radiology reports employing Explainable AI (XAI) as a means for improving healthcare practitioners’ confidence, openness, and comprehension of AI-assisted diagnostics.

Methods:

This study employed the Indiana University chest X-ray Dataset containing 3955 textual reports and 7,470 images. Reports being classified as either normal or abnormal by using machine learning algorithms and ensemble methods, deep learning models, transformers and language models (GPT-2, T5, LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3.1). For image processing, models like CNN, DenseNet121, and DenseNet169 were used. The best models were assessed using XAI methods- SHAP and LIME to support medical experts for decision making.

Results:

LLaMA-3.1 model achieved highest accuracy of 98% in classifying the textual radiology reports. Statistical analysis confirmed the model robustness, with Cohen’s kappa (k=0.981) indicating near perfect agreement beyond chance, both chi-square and Fisher’s Exact test revealing a high significant association between actual and predicted labels(p<0.0001). Although McNemar's test yielded a non-significant result (p=0.25) suggests balance class performance. While the highest accuracy of 84% was achieved in the analysis of imaging data using the DenseNet169 model. Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods SHAP and LIME were applied on best models’ predication that provide useful information how the decisions made provided assurance regarding the interpretability of AI-based diagnostic solutions.

Conclusions:

The research underscores that explainability is an essential component of any AI systems used in diagnostics and helpful in the design and implementation of AI in the healthcare sector. Such approach improves the accuracy of the diagnosis and builds confidence in health workers, who in the future will use explainable AI in clinical settings, particularly in the application of AI explainability for medical purposes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zamir MT, Khan SU, Gelbukh A, Felipe Riverón EM, Gelbukh I

Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77482

DOI: 10.2196/77482

PMID: 40997754

PMCID: 12569488

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.