Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 21, 2017 - Apr 12, 2017
Date Accepted: Sep 20, 2017
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Systems-Based Training in Graduate Medical Education for Service Learning in the State Legislature in the United States: Pilot Study

Shah SH, Clark MD, Hu K, Shoener JA, Fogel J, Kling WC, Ronayne J

Systems-Based Training in Graduate Medical Education for Service Learning in the State Legislature in the United States: Pilot Study

JMIR Med Educ 2017;3(2):e18

DOI: 10.2196/mededu.7730

PMID: 29042343

PMCID: 5663953

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Systems-Based Training in Graduate Medical Education for Service Learning in the State Legislature in the United States: Pilot Study

  • Shikhar H Shah; 
  • Maureen D Clark; 
  • Kimberly Hu; 
  • Jalene A Shoener; 
  • Joshua Fogel; 
  • William C Kling; 
  • James Ronayne

Background:

There is a dearth of advocacy training in graduate medical education in the United States. To address this void, the Legislative Education and Advocacy Development (LEAD) course was developed as an interprofessional experience, partnering a cohort of pediatrics residents, fourth-year medical students, and public health students to be trained in evidence-informed health policy making.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of a service-based legislative advocacy course.

Methods:

We conducted a pilot study using a single-arm pre-post study design with 10 participants in the LEAD course. The course’s didactic portion taught learners how to define policy problems, research the background of the situation, brainstorm solutions, determine evaluation criteria, develop communication strategies, and formulate policy recommendations for state legislators. Learners worked in teams to create and present policy briefs addressing issues submitted by participating Illinois State legislators. We compared knowledge and attitudes of learners from pre- and postcourse surveys. We obtained qualitative feedback from legislators and pediatric residency directors.

Results:

Self-reported understanding of the health care system increased (mean score from 4 to 3.3, P=.01), with answers scored from 1=highly agree to 5=completely disagree. Mean knowledge-based scores improved (6.8/15 to 12.0/15 correct). Pediatric residency program directors and state legislators provided positive feedback about the LEAD course.

Conclusions:

Promising results were demonstrated for the LEAD approach to incorporate advocacy training into graduate medical education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shah SH, Clark MD, Hu K, Shoener JA, Fogel J, Kling WC, Ronayne J

Systems-Based Training in Graduate Medical Education for Service Learning in the State Legislature in the United States: Pilot Study

JMIR Med Educ 2017;3(2):e18

DOI: 10.2196/mededu.7730

PMID: 29042343

PMCID: 5663953

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.