Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 10, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 29, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Consumer Co-Design of an Online Resource to Build Communication Skills of Health Consumers: Mixed Methods Study

Beauchamp A, Hilbers J, Cvetanovska N, Wong Shee A, Horvat L, Rogers S, Cooper A, Flemming-Judge E, Rawlinson S, Jessup R

Consumer Co-Design of an Online Resource to Build Communication Skills of Health Consumers: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77263

DOI: 10.2196/77263

PMID: 41385718

PMCID: 12700338

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Co-design of an online resource to build communication skills of health consumers

  • Alison Beauchamp; 
  • Julieanne Hilbers; 
  • Natali Cvetanovska; 
  • Anna Wong Shee; 
  • Lidia Horvat; 
  • Sandra Rogers; 
  • Andrea Cooper; 
  • Elizabeth Flemming-Judge; 
  • Sue Rawlinson; 
  • Rebecca Jessup

ABSTRACT

Background:

Introduction: Information provided by health professionals can be complex and is often not well understood by healthcare consumers, leading to adverse outcomes. A possible solution is to build consumers’ skills and confidence to check they have understood; however, there are few education resources available that support consumers to build these skills.

Objective:

This study aimed to co-design a web-based learning resource for consumers to actively check they have understood information provided by a health professional (i.e., to ‘check-back’).

Methods:

Methods:

Steps in this co-design study were guided by an Expert Panel including healthcare consumers and health professionals. Phase 1 aimed to understand barriers to consumer-initiated check-back through focus groups/interviews with consumers and health professionals in Victoria, Australia. Phase 2 involved co-design of the web-based learning resource with the Expert Panel. Usability of the resource was determined through a survey and focus group

Results:

Results:

Thirty-nine consumers and 13 health professionals participated in focus groups/interviews. Identified barriers included self-efficacy, pre-existing skills, attitude of the health professional, and information complexity. The co-designed ‘check-back’ resource is guided by a narrator, and includes videos, audio clips and personal action plans. Preliminary feedback indicates high usability and relevance.

Conclusions:

Conclusion: Findings highlight the value of using co-design to develop a consumer-centred, web-based learning resource. Further evaluation is required to demonstrate its effectiveness at improving consumer understanding. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Beauchamp A, Hilbers J, Cvetanovska N, Wong Shee A, Horvat L, Rogers S, Cooper A, Flemming-Judge E, Rawlinson S, Jessup R

Consumer Co-Design of an Online Resource to Build Communication Skills of Health Consumers: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77263

DOI: 10.2196/77263

PMID: 41385718

PMCID: 12700338

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.