Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 8, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 8, 2025 - Jul 3, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 9, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

What Matters Most to Veterans When Deciding to Use Technology for Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey

Etingen B, Smith BM, Shimada SL, Robinson SR, Higashi RT, Ndiwane N, Frisbee KL, Lipschitz JM, Richardson E, Irvin D, Hogan TP

What Matters Most to Veterans When Deciding to Use Technology for Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77113

DOI: 10.2196/77113

PMID: 40773745

PMCID: 12371296

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

What Matters Most to Veterans When Deciding to Use Technology for Health: Results from a National Survey of Veterans

  • Bella Etingen; 
  • Bridget M. Smith; 
  • Stephanie L. Shimada; 
  • Stephanie R. Robinson; 
  • Robin T. Higashi; 
  • Ndindam Ndiwane; 
  • Kathleen L. Frisbee; 
  • Jessica M. Lipschitz; 
  • Eric Richardson; 
  • Dawn Irvin; 
  • Timothy P. Hogan

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is an increasingly diverse range of mobile applications (apps) and digital health devices available to help patients manage their health. Despite evidence for the effectiveness of such technologies in specific care contexts, their potential has not been fully realized as adoption remains low. Such limited uptake can have direct implications for the intended benefits of these technologies.

Objective:

To understand what matters most to US military Veterans when deciding whether to use mobile health apps or devices (i.e., digital health technologies (DHTs)) to manage health.

Methods:

Longitudinal survey data collected from a national sample of Veterans who receive care from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Results:

Among the Veterans included in our analytic cohort (n=857), most (87.0%) reported currently using or having used ≥1 devices in the past to manage their health and most also reported using either VHA or non-VHA health apps (78.3%). Considerations most frequently endorsed as “Very Important” by Veterans when deciding whether to use DHTs included receiving secure messages from their healthcare team (73.2%), knowing their data would inform their care (56.5%), and recommendations from providers (52.6%). Conversely, considerations most frequently endorsed as “Not at All Important” included information on social media (70.5%), community organization support (66.4%), and encouragement from peers (56.7%).

Conclusions:

Understanding what matters most to patients when they are deciding to adopt a technology for their health can, and should, inform the development of implementation strategies and other approaches to enhance health-related technology use. Our results suggest that, for Veterans, recommendations from healthcare team members and knowing data will be used in clinical care are more important than information from social media, community sources, or peers when deciding to use DHTs. Based on our findings, direct communication from healthcare team members to patients, either in-person or electronically, should be encouraged to promote DHT adoption and use. Clinical Trial: N/A.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Etingen B, Smith BM, Shimada SL, Robinson SR, Higashi RT, Ndiwane N, Frisbee KL, Lipschitz JM, Richardson E, Irvin D, Hogan TP

What Matters Most to Veterans When Deciding to Use Technology for Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77113

DOI: 10.2196/77113

PMID: 40773745

PMCID: 12371296

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.