Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 5, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2026

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/76945

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Evaluating the impact of short-notice accreditation assessment on hospitals’ patient safety and quality culture: Protocol for a mixed methods study

  • Robyn Louise Scanlan; 
  • Tracy Flenady; 
  • Amy-Louise Byrne; 
  • Jenni Judd

ABSTRACT

Background:

Accreditation is the process by which hospitals and health services are independently reviewed against established safety and quality standards, and it has been a feature of global health systems for over a century. However, evidence that accreditation directly improves patient safety and quality outcomes remains inconclusive. Inefficiencies and a culture of ‘gaming’ have also been observed, raising questions about the overall effectiveness of accreditation. Consequently, exploration of other formats of accreditation assessment, such as short notice accreditation, have arisen. From 1 July 2023, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality mandated Australian public and private hospitals to engage in short-notice accreditation.

Objective:

This study seeks to explore the impact of short notice accreditation on hospitals, both in terms of safety and quality indicators and in shaping organisational safety and quality culture.

Methods:

A mixed-methods design will be used to investigate these impacts. Quantitative safety and quality indicators will be drawn from a regional health service prior to and following its first short-notice accreditation cycle. From the same site, staff will be invited to complete the Patient Safety Culture Survey and participate in semi-structured interviews. Employing Schein’s [1] Culture Framework as an organisational culture model, the study will examine observable outcomes (artefacts, behaviours, and indicators) alongside staff perceptions and experience (norms and values) to inform understanding of underlying assumptions and beliefs about short notice accreditation assessment processes. Quantitative data will be analysed through cross-tabulation, trend analysis and other statistical techniques, while qualitative data will be synthesised to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Results:

This protocol outlines the planned evaluation of short-notice accreditation and its influence on patient safety and quality culture within a regional health service. Data collection is underway, with pre-intervention surveys being completed and recruitment open for post-intervention interviews. The study is expected to generate new knowledge on how this accreditation assessment process affects patient safety and quality culture of a regional and rural hospitals.

Conclusions:

The findings will inform health policy on the suitability and long-term viability of short notice accreditation as an approach to ensuring safe, high-quality healthcare. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Scanlan RL, Flenady T, Byrne AL, Judd J

Evaluating the impact of short-notice accreditation assessment on hospitals’ patient safety and quality culture: Protocol for a mixed methods study

JMIR Research Protocols. 29/01/2026:76945 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/76945

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/76945

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.