Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: May 4, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 14, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Behind the White Coat: Understanding the Mental and Physical Burdens of Doctors and Support Interventions in Bangladesh
ABSTRACT
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant negative impact on the world, and doctors played a crucial role in providing healthcare while facing the risk of contracting the virus themselves. While working on the frontlines, they also needed to protect themselves and their families from the virus. Unfortunately, their mental health was not given the attention it deserved. Many doctors experienced burnout due to the numerous challenges they faced, yet they received little support. Developing countries such as Bangladesh were particularly affected due to a lack of resources. Although developed countries have proposed a well-being model for doctors, this model is not directly applicable to developing nations. However, redefining the model to suit the specific needs of doctors in developing countries could provide sustainable support for their well-being.
Objective:
Our aim was to gain a deeper understanding of the mental and physical burdens faced by Bangladeshi doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the contextual factors influencing their well-being. By understanding these aspects, we can recommend an adaptable, effective, and sustainable contextual model.
Methods:
We conducted semi-structured online interviews with 14 doctors in Chattogram, Bangladesh, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The doctors were purposefully recruited from public and private hospitals to explore the similarities and differences in their experiences. Participants were between 25 - 35 years old and had up to eight years of working experience, including six interns, five medical officers, two researchers, and one surgeon. Each interview was conducted in Bengali, and we obtained consent to record the audio. A total of 637 minutes of discussion were translated and transcribed. The results were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results:
We identified factors that impacted doctors' mental and physical health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. They frequently dealt with undiagnosed patients, which put them at risk. Doctors often feared the potential danger their profession posed to their families, choosing to prioritize their family's safety over their own. Unfortunately, many of them lacked adequate support from. Heavy workloads, excessive duty hours, and a shortage of colleagues significantly affected their sleep patterns and disrupted their regular work schedules. Instead of receiving societal support, they often faced negative perceptions from the public. Additionally, during times of mass patient deaths, many doctors struggled to cope with their emotions without any mental health support.
Conclusions:
Our work shows doctors' mental and physical health burdens with various contextual difficulties. We understood these concerns and suggested a contextual intervention model inspired by Daniels' well-being framework. We emphasize the importance of integrating both contextual and technological interventions. Through this model, our goal is to involve stakeholders in redesigning the work environment for doctors, ensuring it is sustainable in the long term and adaptable to different situations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.