Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: May 9, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 13, 2025 - Jul 8, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 3, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Quality and Multifunctionality in Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes: Systematic App Review

Zhao Q, Cooke A, Huang L, Tang Y, Dowding D

Quality and Multifunctionality in Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes: Systematic App Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e76862

DOI: 10.2196/76862

PMID: 41643159

PMCID: 12875605

Quality and Multifunctionality in Mobile Applications for Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic App Review

  • Qimeng Zhao; 
  • Alison Cooke; 
  • Lishan Huang; 
  • Yimin Tang; 
  • Dawn Dowding

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of mobile health apps (mHealth apps) can assist with the management of gestational diabetes. Although a number of studies have demonstrated their efficacy in improving maternal–foetal outcomes, opinions differ regarding their usability and overall quality. Poorly designed apps, with ill-conceived features or inappropriate content, may pose a threat to patient safety. Nevertheless, very few studies provide in-depth evaluations of app-design quality, and the diversity of features and techniques employed remains insufficiently explored.

Objective:

To evaluate the quality and multifunctionality of commercially available mHealth apps for gestational diabetes.

Methods:

A systematic app review, guided by the TECH framework and the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Searches were conducted on the Apple Store and Google Play. Apps were screened by name, description, and full navigation to identify inclusions. The quality of the apps was evaluated using the MARS (Mobile App Rating Scale) and IMS (IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score). Multifunctionality of the apps was evaluated using the GDM-adapted Features and Techniques list developed from ABACUS (App Behaviour Change Scale), NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) 2015 guidelines and previous studies. The General Features list, which contains instruction, data security, customisation, and technical issues, was derived from previous studies.

Results:

The search (June 2024) identified 23 commercially available apps from the UK app stores. The overall app quality was evaluated to be satisfactory (MARS: 4.0±0.36, IMS: 5.83±3.03). The multifunctionality evaluation found the apps applied 17.95±7.31 of all 45 items. Overall, our findings suggested that mHealth apps for gestational diabetes, achieved a certain level of multifunctionality. However their feature types and supporting digital techniques are relatively basic. The apps focused on educating and the management of blood glucose control rather than integrating other self-monitoring data and pregnancy-relevant management into their design. The digital techniques used to achieve these features included text and manual operation, rather than other automated features.

Conclusions:

This is the first app review to consider the relationship between app features and usability for women with GDM. Future app development should integrate a wide range of pregnancy-relevant information, more automated features, and employ advanced digital techniques to enable a holistic digital solution for women with gestational diabetes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhao Q, Cooke A, Huang L, Tang Y, Dowding D

Quality and Multifunctionality in Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes: Systematic App Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e76862

DOI: 10.2196/76862

PMID: 41643159

PMCID: 12875605

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.