Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 1, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 3, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Digital Availability of US Departments of Corrections’ Research Policies: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Martinez-Kratz J, Manning D, Vest N, Glenn J, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Wurcel A

The Digital Availability of US Departments of Corrections’ Research Policies: Cross-Sectional Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76835

DOI: 10.2196/76835

PMID: 40835403

PMCID: 12371514

The Digital Availability of U.S. Departments of Corrections Research Policies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

  • Jesse Martinez-Kratz; 
  • David Manning; 
  • Noel Vest; 
  • Jason Glenn; 
  • Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; 
  • Alysse Wurcel

ABSTRACT

There is an urgent need to streamline the processes of ethical research in carceral settings. Unethical research practices conducted in prisons promoted increased federal protections for incarcerated populations. However, the operationalization of federal protections for prisoner-related research has been heterogenous, with each state in the United States standing up independent systems to guide research in prisons. Internet availability of guidance about the process of research in prisons is helpful to researchers who are interested in partnering with carceral settings to evaluate and improve health for people with criminal-legal involvement. The goal of this research study was to evaluate the digital imprint of research policies of the Departments of Corrections (DOC) in the fifty United States. We developed an assessment tool that examined the availability of state DOC research information online. Each DOC was assessed for the presence and content of dedicated research webpages and the availability of contact information for research-related communication. Scores were assigned on an eight-point scale. Of the 48 state DOCs with websites, 33 contained research information—24 contained information on consent, 23 on participant recruitment, and 18 on participant reimbursement. 25 contained contact information for DOC staff. Nine states met all criteria of the eight-point scoring system. This high level of heterogeneity and limited accessibility may limit research initiation, though more work into how the internet accessibility of research documents facilitates prison-based research is required.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Martinez-Kratz J, Manning D, Vest N, Glenn J, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Wurcel A

The Digital Availability of US Departments of Corrections’ Research Policies: Cross-Sectional Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76835

DOI: 10.2196/76835

PMID: 40835403

PMCID: 12371514

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.