Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 2, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 3, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptability, Relevance, and Short-Term Outcomes of the STAC-T Bullying Bystander App: Feasibility Quantitative Study

Doumas DM, Midgett A, Hausheer R, Winburn A, Buller MK, Herbeck B, Perron T, Shelton J

Acceptability, Relevance, and Short-Term Outcomes of the STAC-T Bullying Bystander App: Feasibility Quantitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76830

DOI: 10.2196/76830

PMID: 41252540

PMCID: 12626242

The STAC-T Bullying Bystander App for Middle School Students: A Feasibility Study Examining Acceptability, Relevance, and Short-Term Outcomes

  • Diana M Doumas; 
  • Aida Midgett; 
  • Robin Hausheer; 
  • Amanda Winburn; 
  • Mary K Buller; 
  • Brandon Herbeck; 
  • Taylor Perron; 
  • Jennalyn Shelton

ABSTRACT

Background:

Bullying is a significant public health issue, with approximately 25% of middle school students reporting being a target of bullying in the past year. STAC is an evidence-based bullying bystander intervention for middle school students.

Objective:

We developed a technology-based version of STAC (STAC-T) and evaluated the acceptability and relevance of the program, as well as how acceptability and relevance are related to the use of specific skills (e.g., STAC strategies) students learn in the program.

Methods:

STAC-T, which included a 40-minute training and a 15-minute booster session, was completed by 249 middle school students recruited from six middle schools in rural, low-income communities in the United States. Students completed a post-training survey assessing program acceptability and relevance, whether or not they witnessed bullying post-training, and the use of the STAC strategies to intervene in bullying situations. Descriptive statistics were used to assess acceptability, relevance, and the use of STAC strategies. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of program acceptability and relevance to STAC strategy use.

Results:

The majority of students reported the program was acceptable (82.1% - 90.0%; n = 188-206) and relevant (78.6% - 83.0%; n = 180-190) for students at their school; 88.8% (n = 111) of the 50.2% (n = 125) of students who witnessed bullying post-training also reported the use of at least one STAC strategy to intervene when witnessing bullying. Program relevance was a significant predictor of post-training use of STAC strategies (p = .02). In contrast, program acceptability was not a significant predictor of post-training STAC strategy use (p = .69).

Conclusions:

This study provides support for the acceptability and relevance of STAC-T, as well as the effectiveness in promoting the use of the STAC strategies to intervene in bullying situations. Further, program relevance was related to STAC strategy use, highlighting the importance of assessing program relevance for specific student populations. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05572398


 Citation

Please cite as:

Doumas DM, Midgett A, Hausheer R, Winburn A, Buller MK, Herbeck B, Perron T, Shelton J

Acceptability, Relevance, and Short-Term Outcomes of the STAC-T Bullying Bystander App: Feasibility Quantitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76830

DOI: 10.2196/76830

PMID: 41252540

PMCID: 12626242

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.