Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Apr 27, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 26, 2025 - Nov 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 23, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Where the rubber meets the road: A qualitative descriptive study of medical students' reflections on transitioning to their first General Practice placement.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Transitioning from preclinical-to-clinical training is a critical milestone of ‘becoming and being’ in a medical student's journey. Despite simulation-based learning, real-world clinical exposure remains indispensable in shaping professional identity. The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a complex interplay of social, cultural, and organizational factors that influence students' development as future healthcare professionals.
Objective:
This study explores medical students' reflections on their first clinical placement in General Practice (GP), aiming to understand their experiences, challenges, and the CLE role in their learning and developing professional identity formation (PIF).
Methods:
We analysed reflections from fourth year medical students following their initial GP placement. A qualitative descriptive (QD) approach grounded in naturalism was employed to explain our participants' transitioning encounters in clear, everyday language to ensure their experiences were presented in their own words, without bias. Content thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes related to their experiences.
Results:
Students’ reflections revealed a startled cohort unprepared for the epistemological, emotional, and practical realities of clinical work. Many assumed that classroom ‘knowing’ would seamlessly translate into clinical ‘doing’, but were met instead with uncertainty, failure, and emotional overwhelm, often manifesting as shame, guilt, and withdrawal. These experiences exposed a fracture between knowledge and knowing, underscored by students’ pre-reflective epistemological beliefs and varying degrees of supervisory preparedness. While emotional and cognitive struggles were widespread, rare instances of supportive mentorship and feedback significantly bolstered students’ confidence and participation.
Conclusions:
Reflection offered a valuable window into how students think, feel, and act during this critical transition, but it is not a cure-all. Reflection should be positioned as a developmental and communal tool within a broader scaffolding that includes early skills preparation, role clarity, psychological safety, and trained supervisors. Structured shared reflective circles and narrative listening sessions can help normalise uncertainty, support identity formation, and nurture resilience during students’ entry into clinical practice, and can ease the journey of ‘becoming and being’.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.