Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 28, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Comparison of Ketorolac at Three Doses in Children with Acute Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial (KETODOSE TRIAL)
ABSTRACT
Background:
Intravenous ketorolac is a potent non-opioid analgesic commonly used to treat moderate to severe pain in children and adults. Despite its widespread use in pediatric emergency settings, ketorolac dosing in children remains "off-label," with limited high-quality evidence to guide practice. Pharmacokinetic differences between children and adults suggest that lower ceiling doses adopted from adult practice may lead to suboptimal analgesia in pediatric populations. Inconsistent ketorolac dosing practices across centers reflect substantial clinical uncertainty. Amid efforts to reduce opioid use and provide effective non-opioid alternatives, rigorous pediatric trials evaluating ketorolac dosing are urgently needed.
Objective:
The primary objective is to determine whether two lower-dose intravenous ketorolac strategies (0.25 mg/kg up to 30 mg or 0.5 mg/kg up to 10 mg) are non-inferior to the standard dosing regimen (0.5 mg/kg up to 30 mg) in reducing mean pain scores at 60 minutes post-administration in children aged 6–17 years presenting with moderate to severe pain. The secondary hypothesis is that ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg up to 10 mg will be superior to 0.25 mg/kg up to 30 mg by at least the minimally important difference (MID) of 2.0 points on the verbal Numerical Rating Scale (vNRS).
Methods:
The KETODOSE trial is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial conducted at McMaster Children’s Hospital. Eligible participants aged 6 to <18 years with moderate to severe pain (vNRS >4) are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to standard dosing or one of two low-dose ketorolac regimens. Study drugs are administered via IV push over 5 minutes. Pain scores are assessed at baseline, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, and at 6 hours if still hospitalized. The primary endpoint is the mean change in vNRS score at 60 minutes. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at other time points, time to effective analgesia, rescue analgesia requirements, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Caregiver perceptions regarding analgesic use are evaluated using a mixed-methods semi-structured survey. A sample size of 180 participants (60 per group) provides 80% power to detect non-inferiority within a margin of 1.0 on the vNRS, assuming a standard deviation of 1.5. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be performed.
Results:
Recruitment is ongoing. Final analyses will be performed once follow-up is completed for all participants. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, caregiver- and clinician-facing educational tools, and national knowledge mobilization networks.
Conclusions:
The KETODOSE trial will provide urgently needed evidence to guide ketorolac dosing for acute pain in children. If lower-dose regimens are shown to be non-inferior to standard dosing, this may promote safer prescribing practices, reduce adverse events, and support efforts to minimize pediatric opioid use, thereby improving acute pain management in pediatric emergency care. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05641363
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.