Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 28, 2025 - Jun 23, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 10, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adherence to Posttreatment Surveillance Guidelines in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Retrospective Cohort Study

Randle RJ, Adams SV, Esfahanimonfared Z, Lin N, Wu J, Leung A, Asch SM, Zeliadt S, Sox-Harris A, Han S, Backhus LM

Adherence to Posttreatment Surveillance Guidelines in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e76515

DOI: 10.2196/76515

PMID: 41032697

PMCID: 12488033

Adherence to Post-treatment Surveillance Guidelines in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer – A Veteran’s Health Administration Cohort

  • Ryan J Randle; 
  • Scott V Adams; 
  • Zahra Esfahanimonfared; 
  • Nicole Lin; 
  • Julie Wu; 
  • Ann Leung; 
  • Steven M Asch; 
  • Steven Zeliadt; 
  • Alex Sox-Harris; 
  • Summer Han; 
  • Leah M Backhus

ABSTRACT

Background:

Several guidelines recommend post-treatment surveillance for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies evaluating surveillance patterns often cannot distinguish between imaging ordered for surveillance versus symptoms suggestive of recurrence. Moreover, early recurrences and other competing events hamper efforts to determine true surveillance rates.

Objective:

Leveraging comprehensive Veterans Health Administration data, we develop a novel competing risks framework to describe patterns and predictors of NSCLC imaging surveillance.

Methods:

The study cohort comprised 1,888 patients treated for Stage I-III NSCLC between 2008-2016 who survived ≥6 months. Clinical documents and radiology reports were abstracted for image indication and clinical information. We estimated the cumulative probability of receiving guideline-concordant surveillance defined as chest CT within 4-9 months after treatment, accounting for competing risks and censoring. Multivariable cause-specific Cox regression estimated associations between patient factors and guideline-concordant surveillance and were subsequently adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Results:

Among 1,888 patients, 43.8% (CI, 41.6%-46.1%) received guideline-concordant surveillance within 9 months of treatment, whereas 15.2% (CI,13.7%-16.9%) received non-concordant surveillance and 33.4% (CI, 31.3%-35.5%) received no surveillance. The remaining 7.6% of patients were ineligible for surveillance due to recurrence or death. Compared to years 2008-2010, patients treated for NSCLC from 2014-2016 had a significantly higher likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant surveillance (HR 1.42, P=0.0002).

Conclusions:

In this unique application of a competing risks framework, the rate of guideline-concordant surveillance in this national cohort was lower than many previously reported studies. These data highlight a significant gap in surveillance among eligible, asymptomatic lung cancer survivors emphasizing the need to develop efficient strategies to ensure these patients continue to be monitored.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Randle RJ, Adams SV, Esfahanimonfared Z, Lin N, Wu J, Leung A, Asch SM, Zeliadt S, Sox-Harris A, Han S, Backhus LM

Adherence to Posttreatment Surveillance Guidelines in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e76515

DOI: 10.2196/76515

PMID: 41032697

PMCID: 12488033

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.