Currently accepted at: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Apr 16, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 27, 2026
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/76028
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Efficacy of a CBT-Based Online Self-Help Group for Depression and Suicide Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Despite their prevalence, access to effective treatment remains limited due to financial, geographic, and social barriers. Online self-help groups offer a promising and scalable form of peer-based support beyond traditional clinical settings. Integrating Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) techniques such as cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation into self-help groups may enhance their effectiveness.
Objective:
This study evaluated the efficacy of a CBT-based Online Self-help group (COS), which integrates structured CBT techniques with peer-led group support, as a low-intensity intervention for individuals with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial and a separately recruited waitlist control group were used to examine the efficacy of the COS.
Methods:
Participants were recruited online. After eligibility screening via a structured clinical interview, participants were randomly assigned to a COS group (n = 79) or an CBT-based mobile application group (n = 39). An additional waitlist control group (n = 48) was recruited separately during the second phase of the study. The COS intervention involved seven videoconferencing sessions that incorporated peer-led group discussions, sharing lived experiences, and core CBT techniques such as cognitive restructuring. The primary outcome measure was depressive symptoms, assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the secondary outcome was suicidal ideation, estimated using the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation, measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate group × time interaction effects. Reliable change indices were also calculated to assess clinical significance.
Results:
Among participants assigned to the COS group, 56.5% completed all seven sessions, and 81.2% attended five or more sessions. A significant Time × Group interaction was observed for depressive symptoms (F4, 288.47 = 7.23, P < .001). The COS group exhibited a substantial reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline to post-intervention (t285.76 = 10.77, P < .001), with a large within-group effect size (d = 1.38); this improvement was maintained at the 3-month follow-up. Suicidal ideation also significantly decreased in the COS group (t277.11 = 4.55, P < .001), with sustained effects at follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms, as defined by the Reliable Change Index, was observed in 74.7% of COS participants. While both the COS and app-based CBT groups achieved comparable reductions in depressive symptoms, only the COS group demonstrated a significant reduction in suicidal ideation.
Conclusions:
Our RCT findings provide novel evidence for the efficacy of a structured, CBT-informed online self-help group intervention in reducing depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. The COS program offers a scalable, accessible alternative to traditional therapy, particularly in settings with limited access to mental health professionals. Clinical Trial: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0007673 (One of the primary registries of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.