Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Perioperative Medicine
Date Submitted: Apr 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 25, 2025 - Aug 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 10, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Impact of Social Media on Patient Decision-Making in Selecting Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in Isfahan
ABSTRACT
Background:
The proliferation of social media has reshaped healthcare decision-making, enabling patients to access diverse information sources beyond traditional referrals. In maxillofacial surgery, where trust and expertise are critical, the interplay between digital platforms and conventional networks remains underexplored, particularly in non-Western settings like Iran. Understanding how patients navigate these channels offers insights into evolving healthcare behaviors and informs strategies to enhance patient-centered care.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of social media platforms (Google and Instagram) compared to personal recommendations on maxillofacial surgeon selection among Iranian patients, assessing decision-making factors, trust perceptions, and concerns about information accuracy.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 384 patients at maxillofacial surgery clinics in Isfahan, Iran, in autumn 2023. Data on demographics, pathways to surgeon selection, social media use (Google and Instagram), decision-making factors, trust perceptions and concerns about information accuracy were collected via structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and one-sample t-tests assessed the impact and reliability of digital platforms.
Results:
Personal recommendations dominated surgeon selection (62.2%), far surpassing Google (19.5%) and Instagram (2.9%). While 41.7% and 31.0% of patients used Google and Instagram, respectively, their impact on decision-making was significantly below average (p < 0.001). Patient-generated content (e.g., reviews: 37.5% for Google, 40.9% for Instagram) and professional credentials (30.2% for Google) were pivotal in decision-making and trust, yet moderate concerns about accuracy underscored skepticism toward digital sources. The majority of participants were female (60.7%), aged 21–30 (30.5%), employed (41.4%), and without prior surgery (53.4%).
Conclusions:
Social media plays a supplementary rather than primary role in maxillofacial surgeon selection in Iran, with traditional networks retaining primacy. The reliance on credible patient feedback and credentials highlights the need for verified online content to enhance trust. These findings, contrasting with higher digital reliance in aesthetic surgery contexts, suggest cultural and procedural influences on platform use, advocating for strategies to bridge digital credibility gaps in healthcare decision-making.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.