Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Apr 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 15, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of a Digital Platform for Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapy: Usability Study and Thematic Analysis

Olive MV, La Tona A, Lo Coco G, Compare A, Cafazzo JA, Masella C

Assessment of a Digital Platform for Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapy: Usability Study and Thematic Analysis

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e75885

DOI: 10.2196/75885

PMID: 41027026

PMCID: 12483338

Integrating Digital Tools into Psychotherapists’ Practice: Evidence from the Assessment of a Digital Platform for Routine Outcome Monitoring

  • Mattia Vincenzo Olive; 
  • Antonino La Tona; 
  • Gianluca Lo Coco; 
  • Angelo Compare; 
  • Joseph Antony Cafazzo; 
  • Cristina Masella

ABSTRACT

Background:

The integration of digital tools into psychotherapy has gained increasing attention, particularly for practices such as Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM), which involve the regular collection of patient-reported data to inform treatment decisions. However, despite the potential benefits, the adoption of digital platforms remains limited, partly due to usability concerns and workflow misalignment.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess the usability of a digital platform, Mindy, designed to support psychotherapists in implementing ROM, and to explore broader challenges associated with the integration of digital tools into psychotherapeutic practice.

Methods:

The study adopted a qualitative, two-stage approach. Sixteen psychotherapists participated in semi-structured interviews, which included task-based usability testing and reflective discussions. Participants interacted with Mindy by performing typical clinical tasks, such as creating patient profiles, managing session data, and sending questionnaires. The first stage of analysis employed a deductive thematic approach focused on predefined platform functionalities. The second stage followed an inductive methodology to identify broader themes relating to the integration of digital tools in psychotherapy.

Results:

The usability assessment identified strengths in the platform's appointment scheduling, questionnaire delivery, and dashboard functionalities, which were perceived as intuitive and supportive of ROM practices. However, limitations were reported in areas such as documentation flexibility, interoperability with other systems, and control over information sharing with patients. Broader thematic analysis revealed three main challenges: (i) the tension between standardized documentation and the need for narrative and implicit information; (ii) difficulties in embedding digital platforms into existing therapeutic workflows, especially for clinicians less familiar with technology; and (iii) concerns about confidentiality and the potential for misinterpretation when sharing therapeutic notes with patients.

Conclusions:

These findings underscore the importance of considering both technical and contextual dimensions when developing and implementing digital platforms in mental health care. Tailoring digital tools to the needs and practices of psychotherapists may improve adoption and ultimately enhance the quality of care. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Olive MV, La Tona A, Lo Coco G, Compare A, Cafazzo JA, Masella C

Assessment of a Digital Platform for Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapy: Usability Study and Thematic Analysis

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e75885

DOI: 10.2196/75885

PMID: 41027026

PMCID: 12483338

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.