Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Apr 11, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 23, 2025 - Jun 18, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Interview Study

Dixon BE, Ghimire U, Richter B, Ferguson M, Bowditch C, Rahurkar S, Finnell JT, Vest JR

Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Interview Study

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e75865

DOI: 10.2196/75865

PMID: 41115265

PMCID: 12583940

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Qualitative Study from the Indiana Network for Patient Care

  • Brian Edward Dixon; 
  • Umesh Ghimire; 
  • Benjamin Richter; 
  • Matthew Ferguson; 
  • Corrine Bowditch; 
  • Saurabh Rahurkar; 
  • John T Finnell; 
  • Joshua R Vest

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health information exchange (HIE) supports clinical decision-making in emergency medicine settings. Despite evidence and policies that encourage adoption of HIE, usage by clinicians is limited. Moreover, few studies examine usage of HIE years after adoption by hospitals or clinics.

Objective:

To examine perceptions and usage of a mature, operational HIE system by emergency department (ED) clinicians years after its implementation.

Methods:

We interviewed 21 clinicians in various roles (e.g., attending physician, nurse practitioner) across multiple health systems that participate in a statewide HIE network. We asked questions about their use of the HIE system and the factors that facilitate or inhibit use. Analysis of interview transcripts was guided by a theoretical framework derived from information systems theories describing individual perception of and usage behavior towards HIE systems.

Results:

A total of 26 factors across 6 domains were identified by respondents. All respondents recognized the value of HIE for medical decision-making in the ED, and access to information via the HIE was preferred over traditional methods of calling other facilities or waiting for faxed records. Ease of use, particularly single sign on (SSO) functionality, was recognized as a key facilitator to routine use, enabling clinician access via a single click from their EHR directly into the patient’s HIE record. Access to integrated data and advanced search features supported clinical decision-making. Limited training and poor system usability were identified as barriers to use.

Conclusions:

Achieving widespread adoption and use of HIE systems globally will require a focused effort to address multiple individual perception and behavioral factors. Researchers, HIE organizational leaders, and policymakers alike should leverage these factors to achieve the goals of HIE and interoperability. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dixon BE, Ghimire U, Richter B, Ferguson M, Bowditch C, Rahurkar S, Finnell JT, Vest JR

Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Interview Study

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e75865

DOI: 10.2196/75865

PMID: 41115265

PMCID: 12583940

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.