Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Apr 9, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 9, 2025 - Jun 4, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 17, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Public Involvement in Cancer Research: Collaborative Evaluation Using Photovoice

Teodorowski P, McInnes M, Dale G, Galbraith L, Radin E, Gold K, Gadsby E

Public Involvement in Cancer Research: Collaborative Evaluation Using Photovoice

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e75741

DOI: 10.2196/75741

PMID: 40720870

PMCID: 12303542

Public involvement in cancer research: collaborative evaluation using photovoice

  • Piotr Teodorowski; 
  • Melanie McInnes; 
  • Glen Dale; 
  • Linda Galbraith; 
  • Esme Radin; 
  • Karen Gold; 
  • Erica Gadsby

ABSTRACT

Background:

A public involvement group consisting of four lay members of the public with lived experience of cancer diagnosis contributed to two cancer research projects that focused on optimising the diagnostic pathways for patients with suspected cancer. The public contributors have been involved from the start of the projects and were involved in aspects of the design, analysis and dissemination alongside research and clinical teams. Despite public involvement in cancer research being seen as a key element of the research process, there is still a limited understanding of what works well and how to do it in a meaningful way for both researchers and public contributors.

Objective:

To evaluate the public involvement process in two cancer research projects.

Methods:

This was a collaborative evaluation with the research team and public contributors jointly evaluating the process. Data was collected throughout the lifespan of the project by public contributors through photovoice. In the end, public contributors reflected on their experiences using the four-dimensional framework as developed by Gibson and colleagues.

Results:

Public contributors chose seven photos from the photovoice to present their experience of involvement in these projects. Results from the four-dimensional framework showed that public contributors felt that their voices were strong, and the research and clinical team mostly implemented suggested changes. The discussion focussed on topics and issues that were relevant to public contributors. However, how public contributors were involved depended mainly on the research team's decision, and they would have preferred more opportunities.

Conclusions:

The paper demonstrated how to actively and meaningfully involve people with lived experience of cancer in research. It identified what worked well and key lessons for future cancer projects. These included involving public contributors as early as the funding application stage to offer more opportunities to shape research and offering diverse involvement opportunities at each stage of the research process.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Teodorowski P, McInnes M, Dale G, Galbraith L, Radin E, Gold K, Gadsby E

Public Involvement in Cancer Research: Collaborative Evaluation Using Photovoice

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e75741

DOI: 10.2196/75741

PMID: 40720870

PMCID: 12303542

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.